Trades with cats wrote:..........And now Goldman has added more weight to exhaustion with their announcement of no more stock buybacks in Quarter 2. We will see who follows their lead.
boss: do you remember the source of that info?
pretty important, thanks much
Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor. This is just my opinion NOT investment advice.
Trades with cats wrote:..........And now Goldman has added more weight to exhaustion with their announcement of no more stock buybacks in Quarter 2. We will see who follows their lead.
boss: do you remember the source of that info?
pretty important, thanks much
Trades with cats wrote:..........And now Goldman has added more weight to exhaustion with their announcement of no more stock buybacks in Quarter 2. We will see who follows their lead.
boss: do you remember the source of that info?
pretty important, thanks much
Trades with cats wrote:Well a whole lot of people on twitter with their own web sites have been calling for it for days. So as a retail investor I have been conditioned to expect that price. Or as Jim Cramer says, buy, buy, buy. After the two legged strong overnight advance the New York session offering another nothing burger should be a source of confusion for the bulls.
On a none sarcastic note if we are in a topping process then these counter trend waves are supposed to pull the last of the bull money out of the mattress as a lack of buyers is the definition of the top. And now Goldman has added more weight to exhaustion with their announcement of no more stock buybacks in Quarter 2. We will see who follows their lead.
Sorry, buddy, but you need a better indicator set. I can show you several metrics that are BELOW March 2009. That's right. Measurements that show less risk and more under-valuation now than at that time. I don't think the market is poised to rocket higher as it did then, but it's going up...a lot. The fact is there is not a hint of euphoria *in the metrics that matter*. Furthermore, inflation expectations are so low that the Fed won't get aggressive yet, which pushes assets prices higher in general. It could literally be years until the "top" happens and it will probably be 30% or more higher at minimum.
Cletus, if you look at the SPX weekly chart posted by Fehro, you will see that price is making lower highs and lower lows. It means bears are still in control, so every move up is just a bounce until proven otherwise. You can start making a case for the bulls if you see a weekly close above 2800. But even then, it doesn't mean bulls are is control. All it will mean is that bears are no longer in control. So both will have to fight for control.
Right now, assuming we close above the 50 and hold, speculating bit more pop, backtest 50, then into final rung of Jacob's ladder...
bears need to get back 50 quick for a shot. imho
Trades with cats wrote:..........And now Goldman has added more weight to exhaustion with their announcement of no more stock buybacks in Quarter 2. ...........
Ha Ha, Goldman is an FDIC insured bank. But you are right, if they are hoarding cash they see that no tree grows to the sky. I have agreed in the past and still do today that as interest rates slowly move higher no one will want to own those balance sheets that have lots of buyback debt.
Trades with cats wrote:Ha Ha, Goldman is an FDIC insured bank. But you are right, if they are hoarding cash they see that no tree grows to the sky. I have agreed in the past and still do today that as interest rates slowly move higher no one will want to own those balance sheets that have lots of buyback debt.
i am still pereplexed why they ANNOUNCED no Q2 buybacks
they didn't have to ANNOUNCE it
Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor. This is just my opinion NOT investment advice.
Trades with cats wrote:Ha Ha, Goldman is an FDIC insured bank. But you are right, if they are hoarding cash they see that no tree grows to the sky. I have agreed in the past and still do today that as interest rates slowly move higher no one will want to own those balance sheets that have lots of buyback debt.
i am still pereplexed why they ANNOUNCED no Q2 buybacks
they didn't have to ANNOUNCE it
maybe it was a question during the investors call?
Clueless wrote:... look at the SPX weekly chart posted by Fehro, you will see that price is making lower highs and lower lows.
...
Since the Feb spike down, recent lows have been higher.
There was a one day spike down April 4, since then lows have been higher each week.
I'm happy you said a "spike." That is why I don't focus on them. I focus on the open and close. Many factors can cause a spike such as ERROR ("fat finger"), news, fake news, misunderstanding... In other words, spikes (especially long ones) are just noise.
That is why I said to Cletus "You can start making a case for the bulls if you see a weekly CLOSE above 2800."
Last edited by Clueless on Tue Apr 17, 2018 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Well if you are ending buybacks at some time you do have to tell the stockholders and during the conference call after good earnings are announced makes a certain amount of sense in that the best hope of having it ignored. Would have been worse if a Wall Street Journal reporter culled it out of a board meeting and turned it into a head line.
Bank earnings under the hood not so red hot. Regular day to day banking not doing that well. Sorta like this week's retail number, looked good until you took out gasoline and auto sales.