ZimZeb wrote:cougar (or others): can you point me to somewhere I might learn more about the "harmonic time extensions" methodology you use?
Thx & wishing a prosperous new year to all!
Zim-Zeb: I do not know of any book or site that deals specifically with that issue. I do my own work and testing in that direction, with the help of some available “drawing tools”.
Briefly:
* the “time extended” (TE) is the entire time during which a powerful and well-defined impulse happened, either up or down. You chose it according to your own criteria.
* the vertical lines that follow are constructed to become time pivots as fractional multiples of that TE. They can be:
- straight Fibonacci ratios 23.6, 38.2, 61.8...to which you usually add 50, 100, 200...all expressed as percentages. .
- Fibonacci numbers (13, 21, 34, 55...) also + multiples of 50.
- Gann “fatidic numbers”. Gann discovered, via exhaustive back-testing some very significant numbers.
Some of them coincide with Fibonacci numbers (like144, which is also sq. of 12). Others seem to be the products of some hocus-pocus, like 7 and 17 (…many of them are prime numbers).
- “Harmonic numbers”' which are derived via a math artifice, systematically applied to Fibonacci ratios, Fib or Gann numbers, or some horizontal series of 1/n steps. There is no standard procedure but, for example, one can accelerate the time pivots by creating a new, simple and organized progression:
#1: 5x1.3 = 6.5 or ~6
#2: 8x1.3x1.3 =13.52 (~14)
#3 13x1.3x1.3x1.3 = 28.56 (~29)
#4: 21x1.3x1.3x1.3x1.3 = 59.98 (~60)
This is not identical, but similar to procedures used in music and physics…One can go into more complex methods of creating new progressions of pivots…But, as Cobra says, this would require too much typing… Anyway, what is important is to understand that, since stocks, indices and ETF-s of various multiplicities have distinct time-related evolutions, we have to analyze them with different and “specific” tools. Just imagine the catastrophe produced by analyzing 2 stocks like RIMM and INHX with the same time/price scale.
So...how do we figure out which time scale fits to a stock? This can be done “by hand” trying a few recipes for harmonization, which worked previously, in analogous situations…or by a well-instructed BOT who can go through a large number of harmonic variants in a matter of seconds and chose those which best fit to many points of reversal or acceleration spikes. But even then, the human touch is required to determine whether those reversals are significant, in the general picture of the succession of trends. And, after that, we have 2 more steps: back testing for various domains of definition and finally…patiently waiting for the next time pivot to confirm or negate the validity of the scale…
All in all, this is a personal endeavor and not a standard procedure.
Happy New Year and GL with your work!