Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
great chart, here is pF notice that previous spike to $36+ aand immediate hi pole reversal?mozart wrote:Silver,chart is pretty much what other members posted.
Short positions are declining, people waiting for QE3, hope never dies, bulls probably thinking of the moon,and story goes on.
In previous attempts Silver touched upper line briefly , than sharp pull back, will it break this time????
$32 line will be hard to break.
Have a great weekend guys!!!
100 stockcharts subscribers is a lot. That pays for a toupee for Murphy and much much more.Cobra wrote:They don't even want to know me. They just want those big names to write things for their blog.Al_Dente wrote:Cobra: I agree. I sent them a long email this morning. We’ll see how they reply.Cobra wrote:That Pro idea is outrageous. I thought it were additional features added on the current services so that they can compete with freestockcharts.com. No, it's not, how can they charge more and more while competing with free services?Al_Dente wrote:Stockcharts new toys
They now have the capability to use 10 (ten) symbols on one chart, instead of the old 6 symbols.
Of course it costs an arm/leg for the new “PRO” service…it also includes a bunch of other stuff….
like the longest DOW chart known to man (PRO service gets a LIVE version):
http://blogs.stockcharts.com/.a/6a01053 ... e70970c-pi
[Caveat: this is not a recommendation for “PRO” … I don’t have it yet….i’m pizzzed they are charging extra for 4 additional symbols,
plus other stuff that I will NEVER use]
(They always reply within 24 hours…….. unless I use cuss words in my email……then, no reply)
EVERYONE knows that you are their “rock star”. Perhaps an email from you will get their attention (?).
I think we need let this board know, so everyone writes mails to them, maybe they'd pay attention. Judging by daily votes to my public charts list, we might have around 100 stockcharts members.
Well, your subtle way would be ignored by them, I bet.Al_Dente wrote:100 stockcharts subscribers is a lot. That pays for a toupee for Murphy and much much more.
I think u represent many more than that. When I first found your charts four years ago, I recall you had 32,000 or 37,000+ viewers or hits or something.
That’s what got me started watching you. Now they reset the count to make everyone look small, but u are still clearly on top, as everybody knows.
Their blog shite pales in comparison to your work.
This is an edited version of the email I sent to them (via >home >support, scroll down to the yellow box > and send them an email if u wish)
DO NOT COPY ANY PORTION OF THIS EMAIL. Use your own words, stating your own issue and etc…
Dear stockcharts:
Your pricing/services matrix is now officially broken.
Why should subscribers pay for services they WILL NEVER use?
Why not try a more efficient “cafeteria style” pricing structure.
For example: can you quote me a decent subscription upgrade price for:
1) exactly what I have now
2) minus any real-time European quotes (as they are incomplete anyway)
3) minus any custom scans, minus any other bells-and-whistles you offer at my level
4) PLUS THE CAPACITY TO ADD 4 EXTRA SYMBOLS TO CHARTS (for 10 symbols instead of 6)
5) minus any custom alerts and other new features which I will not use
If you believe that my adding 4 symbols will burden your servers, you are mistaken.
If I add symbols on my main charts, I will be able to DELETE MANY redundant charts.
Charging an extra arm-and-a-leg simply to add 4 symbols, while NOT using any other fancy features, just upsets subscribers, which isn’t really smart, considering all the free services available elsewhere.
I know you have some old-timers on your staff who remember the old “Quotron” terminals. They went bankrupt when they couldn’t rise to the competition, and they drowned in their own arrogance and hubris.
Thank you for your consideration...
End of rant for the weekend…
Tom Waits: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YErXozSH ... re=related
Only do whatever is best for you.Cobra wrote:Well, your subtle way would be ignored by them, I bet.Al_Dente wrote:End of rant for the weekend…
I'll write a mail to them complaining about pro fee. I actually just need their bigger size support for back test purpose, but I certainly can live without it.
I'm not short but will look at DUST around $49 (EDIT: IN GDX) or sonoob wrote:A short at close to $50 ish? Looks a bit more upside left.ClarkW wrote:The Bullish Gartley on daily for GDX worked well but looks to be out of juice. See other times ChiOsc was this high on weekly plus pink trendline providing resistance
I second that! You give a lot of free info, too much in my opinion. You deserve moreAl_Dente wrote:Only do whatever is best for you.Cobra wrote:Well, your subtle way would be ignored by them, I bet.Al_Dente wrote:End of rant for the weekend…
I'll write a mail to them complaining about pro fee. I actually just need their bigger size support for back test purpose, but I certainly can live without it.
On a related note, u should take a cue from the stockcharts “sheisters” and put more content on your subscription site and less content on your free board
(I know that’s heresy, but I’m a subscriber, what do I care? I want YOU to make more money, NOT stockcharts…)
Thanks.ClarkW wrote:I second that! You give a lot of free info, too much in my opinion. You deserve moreAl_Dente wrote:Only do whatever is best for you.Cobra wrote:Well, your subtle way would be ignored by them, I bet.Al_Dente wrote:End of rant for the weekend…
I'll write a mail to them complaining about pro fee. I actually just need their bigger size support for back test purpose, but I certainly can live without it.
On a related note, u should take a cue from the stockcharts “sheisters” and put more content on your subscription site and less content on your free board
(I know that’s heresy, but I’m a subscriber, what do I care? I want YOU to make more money, NOT stockcharts…)
to make it amusing yet ironically logical, I am eyeing around 1989.64 as bottom.ClarkW wrote:POSSIBLE Bullish Gartley forming in China ($SSEC). Might take a month or so to form, if it does, just something to keep in mind. Although my A.D.D. will probably not allow me to remember
GDX pink line may not be accurate. On my tc2000, the trendline was actually poked.ClarkW wrote:The Bullish Gartley on daily for GDX worked well but looks to be out of juice. See other times ChiOsc was this high on weekly plus pink trendline providing resistance