Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
PS should read 1186KENA wrote:BB52x..It looks like the mkt can't break 1176 area.Several attempts. Now it is below my trend line. Now lets see.
YupPetsamo wrote:In looking at the 1 min chart, did we just get a signal to sell off?
cobra: I really want it to hold 117.64 which is the neckline for the reverse head and shoulders, and the important support from the 8/8 high. Love ya, manCobra wrote:OK, so much of the ascending triangle cases, now let's see rectangle case, the green line below must hold in order for this case to be valid.
Japan, Hang Seng, & India sold off from their open. Europe rallied. I think we're just responding to Asia. A Europe gap down on Monday makes sense.Al_Dente wrote:YupPetsamo wrote:In looking at the 1 min chart, did we just get a signal to sell off?
No, no, no. Ned Davis is way outside my pay grade. The info comes from the text book mentioned, one that I have read cover to cover and can recommend as well written. As far as tops and bottoms go, I like to say that bottoms don't last long, but tops drag on forever (relatively speaking).varaamo wrote:Many Thanks rhight for sharing this.
Does Ned Davis have any similar indicator for determining tops of this intermediate runs? Looks like you subscribing to Ned Davis newsletter or something? If so, can you please share the type of subscription to their research. On their website, i noticed there are bunch of them.
rhight wrote: I'm including a chart of one indicator that supposedly has a good track record and has not triggered since March 2009 (see bottom of chart.) The idea comes from "Technical Analysis" Kirkpatrick/Dahlquist page 147.
The Ned Davis data set is from 1966 to 2005, the chart is labeled "New Highs Minus New Lows / Issues Traded -- Five Day Smoothing" in which they label this zone "So Bad It's Good". The text reads, "It shows a particularly strong positive result when the ratio declines to below -13.8%. Otherwise, the results are mixed."
I'm disappointed. so far the market only proves my forecast: this is just a rebound.oldpigwang wrote:Cobra Da: do you feel bearish by this big down bar?
Petsamo wrote:Japan, Hang Seng, & India sold off from their open. Europe rallied. I think we're just responding to Asia. A Europe gap down on Monday makes sense.Al_Dente wrote:YupPetsamo wrote:In looking at the 1 min chart, did we just get a signal to sell off?
rhight wrote:No, no, no. Ned Davis is way outside my pay grade. The info comes from the text book mentioned, one that I have read cover to cover and can recommend as well written. As far as tops and bottoms go, I like to say that bottoms don't last long, but tops drag on forever (relatively speaking).varaamo wrote:Many Thanks rhight for sharing this.
Does Ned Davis have any similar indicator for determining tops of this intermediate runs? Looks like you subscribing to Ned Davis newsletter or something? If so, can you please share the type of subscription to their research. On their website, i noticed there are bunch of them.
rhight wrote: I'm including a chart of one indicator that supposedly has a good track record and has not triggered since March 2009 (see bottom of chart.) The idea comes from "Technical Analysis" Kirkpatrick/Dahlquist page 147.
The Ned Davis data set is from 1966 to 2005, the chart is labeled "New Highs Minus New Lows / Issues Traded -- Five Day Smoothing" in which they label this zone "So Bad It's Good". The text reads, "It shows a particularly strong positive result when the ratio declines to below -13.8%. Otherwise, the results are mixed."
How much is Ned Davis services?rhight wrote:No, no, no. Ned Davis is way outside my pay grade. The info comes from the text book mentioned, one that I have read cover to cover and can recommend as well written. As far as tops and bottoms go, I like to say that bottoms don't last long, but tops drag on forever (relatively speaking).varaamo wrote:Many Thanks rhight for sharing this.
Does Ned Davis have any similar indicator for determining tops of this intermediate runs? Looks like you subscribing to Ned Davis newsletter or something? If so, can you please share the type of subscription to their research. On their website, i noticed there are bunch of them.
rhight wrote: I'm including a chart of one indicator that supposedly has a good track record and has not triggered since March 2009 (see bottom of chart.) The idea comes from "Technical Analysis" Kirkpatrick/Dahlquist page 147.
The Ned Davis data set is from 1966 to 2005, the chart is labeled "New Highs Minus New Lows / Issues Traded -- Five Day Smoothing" in which they label this zone "So Bad It's Good". The text reads, "It shows a particularly strong positive result when the ratio declines to below -13.8%. Otherwise, the results are mixed."
I won'toldpigwang wrote:Can we enter short here?