Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com

01/16/2016 Weekend Update

uempel
Posts: 8685
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:38 am

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by uempel »

January 2008 in comparison to January 2016:
2007/08: Post Santa decline in SPX had an incredible downwards momentum, lost 15.5 percent in 18 trading sessions.
2007/08: Post Santa decline in SPX had an incredible downwards momentum, lost 15.5 percent in 18 trading sessions.
2015/16: so far the Post Santa decline in SPX has lost 10.7 percent in 12 trading sessions
2015/16: so far the Post Santa decline in SPX has lost 10.7 percent in 12 trading sessions
brucekeller
Posts: 230
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:42 am

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by brucekeller »

http://www.investing.com/indices/indices-futures has a nice list of most world futures too, all in one screen and then has tradingview's charting system to boot.
User avatar
DellGriffith
Posts: 1803
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by DellGriffith »

uempel wrote:January 2008 in comparison to January 2016:
2008.png
201516B.png
The rebound in January of 2008 began after MLK day. MLK day was 1/21/2008. The low was 1/22. So maybe we set a low tomorrow get a rebound from there.
bearish as of SPY 406 on 2/17/23
currently: end bearish as of SPY 406 on 3/6/23
User avatar
GreedyKojiro
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:21 pm
Contact:

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by GreedyKojiro »

retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Attachments
Last Two Kisses of Good Bye.png
Will Be A Kiss of Good Bye.jpg
fehro
Posts: 22880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:06 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by fehro »

/CL - USOIL racing towards multi year support level 26.50/25.50
Attachments
W/D/60m USOIL
W/D/60m USOIL
1990- 2016 - USOIL - long long term Weekly
1990- 2016 - USOIL - long long term Weekly
uempel
Posts: 8685
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:38 am

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by uempel »

DellGriffith wrote:
uempel wrote:January 2008 in comparison to January 2016:
2008.png
201516B.png
The rebound in January of 2008 began after MLK day. MLK day was 1/21/2008. The low was 1/22. So maybe we set a low tomorrow get a rebound from there.
I've got a signal for Thursday ...
User avatar
DellGriffith
Posts: 1803
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by DellGriffith »

I'm mostly following oil today too.
bearish as of SPY 406 on 2/17/23
currently: end bearish as of SPY 406 on 3/6/23
uempel
Posts: 8685
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:38 am

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by uempel »

GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too :mrgreen: Of course there might :?: :?: :?: be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
d.png
User avatar
GreedyKojiro
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:21 pm
Contact:

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by GreedyKojiro »

uempel wrote:
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too :mrgreen: Of course there might :?: :?: :?: be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
d.png

It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye :twisted:
uempel
Posts: 8685
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:38 am

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by uempel »

We know that catching falling knives is a losers game. But should somebody be hell-bent on going long next week check out SPX 1823. And should SPX touch the 1823 area next Wednesday or Thursday the odds are 51:49 that there might be a rebound :geek: But as I said, it's a losers game. Odds worse than in Russian Roulette :mrgreen:
SPX2.png
User avatar
DellGriffith
Posts: 1803
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by DellGriffith »

uempel wrote:We know that catching falling knives is a losers game. But should somebody be hell-bent on going long next week check out SPX 1823. And should SPX touch the 1823 area next Wednesday or Thursday the odds are 51:49 that there might be a rebound :geek: But as I said, it's a losers game. Odds worse than in Russian Roulette :mrgreen:
SPX2.png
There are plenty of support lines you can draw on that chart that didn't get retested before a bounce occurred. For example, there's a dip in June of 2013 that connects to Feb of 2014. The next two drops in 2014 failed to get back to that line.
bearish as of SPY 406 on 2/17/23
currently: end bearish as of SPY 406 on 3/6/23
uempel
Posts: 8685
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:38 am

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by uempel »

Kojiro, let's agree to disagree. I see the rebound up to the blue channel with a top at SPX 2016.48 as a romantic good-bye kiss ....
This is a TA kiss
This is a TA kiss
Visualization of a TA kiss
Visualization of a TA kiss
GreedyKojiro wrote:
uempel wrote:
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too :mrgreen: Of course there might :?: :?: :?: be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
The attachment d.png is no longer available

It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye :twisted:
User avatar
BullBear52x
Posts: 29720
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by BullBear52x »

Why don't we look at earning (GAAP)? market will be slump until it turns around in big picture long term.
1.PNG
for scalping, it's good day any day but for long term investment many funds are under 10% to 20% drop from their peaks, check them out to get a good view.
4.PNG
market never tank on low fear, fear is high right now
2.PNG
3.PNG
My comments are for entertainment/educational purpose only. NOT a trade advice.
User avatar
MrMiyagi
Posts: 10328
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:48 pm

Post by MrMiyagi »

fehro wrote:/CL - USOIL racing towards multi year support level 26.50/25.50
I think the Saudis want this at $25, they haven't killed off Canada's economy just yet.
User avatar
GreedyKojiro
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:21 pm
Contact:

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by GreedyKojiro »

uempel wrote:Kojiro, let's agree to disagree. I see the rebound up to the blue channel with a top at SPX 2016.48 as a romantic good-bye kiss ....
TAK.png
Kiss.png
GreedyKojiro wrote:
uempel wrote:
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too :mrgreen: Of course there might :?: :?: :?: be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
d.png

It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye :twisted:
I totally agree with you, Uempel, those kisses are Daily good bye. Shouldn't we need a Weekly good bye also? If you look at both cases in late 2000-early 2001 and early 2008 I posted above, we should revisit 1980 area for at least once (yes, maybe it is too much to ask for 2010).
User avatar
BullBear52x
Posts: 29720
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by BullBear52x »

GreedyKojiro wrote:
uempel wrote:Kojiro, let's agree to disagree. I see the rebound up to the blue channel with a top at SPX 2016.48 as a romantic good-bye kiss ....
The attachment TAK.png is no longer available
The attachment Kiss.png is no longer available
GreedyKojiro wrote:
uempel wrote:
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too :mrgreen: Of course there might :?: :?: :?: be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
The attachment d.png is no longer available

It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye :twisted:
I totally agree with you, Uempel, those kisses are Daily good bye. Shouldn't we need a Weekly good bye also? If you look at both cases in late 2000-early 2001 and early 2008 I posted above, we should revisit 1980 area for at least once (yes, maybe it is too much to ask for 2010).
Attachments
1.PNG
My comments are for entertainment/educational purpose only. NOT a trade advice.
User avatar
Al_Dente
Posts: 28535
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by Al_Dente »

catfight.png.png
CAT FIGHT ALERT:
zh alleged that “Dallas Fed members had met with banks in Houston and explicitly ‘told them not to force energy bankruptcies’ and to demand asset sales instead.” Further, zh alleged that the FED suspended “mark to market” rules for energy debt.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-1 ... orce-shale

This “rumor” was debunked by the Dallas Fed.
zh responds, demanding transparency and full disclosure via a FOIA filing [Freedom of Information Act].
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-1 ... -questions

Elsewhere: WFC, the largest U.S. mortgage lender, disclosed in last week’s conference call that they have $17 billion in outstanding energy loans, the majority of which is rated junk, and they “set aside” $1.2 billion (7%) in “loan loss reserves” to cover losses in the oil and gas portfolio.
Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor. This is just my opinion NOT investment advice.
User avatar
BullBear52x
Posts: 29720
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by BullBear52x »

How is real Estate? lets look at IYR
Attachments
1.PNG
My comments are for entertainment/educational purpose only. NOT a trade advice.
User avatar
Al_Dente
Posts: 28535
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by Al_Dente »

OIL UPDATE:
And now Bloomberg SHOWS the Koch Brothers oil refinery, "Paying" -$0.50 For North Dakota Crude [yes, that’s NEGATIVE fifty cents per barrel].
“…the crude glut is now so acute that the Koch brothers are actually charging 0.50/bbl to take low grade oil at their Flint Hills Resources refining arm.”

zh snarks: “It's no wonder the Dallas Fed suspended mark-to-market on energy debts - there's no market to mark to.”
[source: Bloomberg via zh]
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-1 ... kota-crude
Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor. This is just my opinion NOT investment advice.
josephli
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 10:56 pm

Re: 01/16/2016 Weekend Update

Post by josephli »

Al_Dente wrote:
catfight.png.png
CAT FIGHT ALERT:
zh alleged that “Dallas Fed members had met with banks in Houston and explicitly ‘told them not to force energy bankruptcies’ and to demand asset sales instead.” Further, zh alleged that the FED suspended “mark to market” rules for energy debt.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-1 ... orce-shale

This “rumor” was debunked by the Dallas Fed.
zh responds, demanding transparency and full disclosure via a FOIA filing [Freedom of Information Act].
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-1 ... -questions

Elsewhere: WFC, the largest U.S. mortgage lender, disclosed in last week’s conference call that they have $17 billion in outstanding energy loans, the majority of which is rated junk, and they “set aside” $1.2 billion (7%) in “loan loss reserves” to cover losses in the oil and gas portfolio.
For the bank industry's exposure in energy-related junk bond, interesting article here:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... 0-a-barrel

it keep me wonder why you guys spend more time on ZH than bloomberg? presumably bloomberg has much better contents.
Last edited by josephli on Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply