GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too Of course there might be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too Of course there might be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
d.png
It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye
We know that catching falling knives is a losers game. But should somebody be hell-bent on going long next week check out SPX 1823. And should SPX touch the 1823 area next Wednesday or Thursday the odds are 51:49 that there might be a rebound But as I said, it's a losers game. Odds worse than in Russian Roulette
uempel wrote:We know that catching falling knives is a losers game. But should somebody be hell-bent on going long next week check out SPX 1823. And should SPX touch the 1823 area next Wednesday or Thursday the odds are 51:49 that there might be a rebound But as I said, it's a losers game. Odds worse than in Russian Roulette
SPX2.png
There are plenty of support lines you can draw on that chart that didn't get retested before a bounce occurred. For example, there's a dip in June of 2013 that connects to Feb of 2014. The next two drops in 2014 failed to get back to that line.
bearish as of SPY 406 on 2/17/23
currently: end bearish as of SPY 406 on 3/6/23
Kojiro, let's agree to disagree. I see the rebound up to the blue channel with a top at SPX 2016.48 as a romantic good-bye kiss ....
This is a TA kiss
Visualization of a TA kiss
GreedyKojiro wrote:
uempel wrote:
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too Of course there might be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
The attachment d.png is no longer available
It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye
Why don't we look at earning (GAAP)? market will be slump until it turns around in big picture long term.
for scalping, it's good day any day but for long term investment many funds are under 10% to 20% drop from their peaks, check them out to get a good view.
market never tank on low fear, fear is high right now
My comments are for entertainment/educational purpose only. NOT a trade advice.
uempel wrote:Kojiro, let's agree to disagree. I see the rebound up to the blue channel with a top at SPX 2016.48 as a romantic good-bye kiss ....
TAK.png
Kiss.png
GreedyKojiro wrote:
uempel wrote:
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too Of course there might be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
d.png
It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye
I totally agree with you, Uempel, those kisses are Daily good bye. Shouldn't we need a Weekly good bye also? If you look at both cases in late 2000-early 2001 and early 2008 I posted above, we should revisit 1980 area for at least once (yes, maybe it is too much to ask for 2010).
uempel wrote:Kojiro, let's agree to disagree. I see the rebound up to the blue channel with a top at SPX 2016.48 as a romantic good-bye kiss ....
The attachment TAK.png is no longer available
The attachment Kiss.png is no longer available
GreedyKojiro wrote:
uempel wrote:
GreedyKojiro wrote:retest of 1980? or even 2010? It ain't dramatic without a kiss of good bye!... although any breakup will have some pain before the last kiss....
Kojiro, we know that you are greedy, but are you blind too Of course there might be a rebound, but I don't see any kissing ...
The attachment d.png is no longer available
It was sure a kiss, Uempel! But it wasn't a kiss of good bye
I totally agree with you, Uempel, those kisses are Daily good bye. Shouldn't we need a Weekly good bye also? If you look at both cases in late 2000-early 2001 and early 2008 I posted above, we should revisit 1980 area for at least once (yes, maybe it is too much to ask for 2010).
Attachments
My comments are for entertainment/educational purpose only. NOT a trade advice.
CAT FIGHT ALERT:
zh alleged that “Dallas Fed members had met with banks in Houston and explicitly ‘told them not to force energy bankruptcies’ and to demand asset sales instead.” Further, zh alleged that the FED suspended “mark to market” rules for energy debt. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-1 ... orce-shale
Elsewhere: WFC, the largest U.S. mortgage lender, disclosed in last week’s conference call that they have $17 billion in outstanding energy loans, the majority of which is rated junk, and they “set aside” $1.2 billion (7%) in “loan loss reserves” to cover losses in the oil and gas portfolio.
Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor. This is just my opinion NOT investment advice.
OIL UPDATE:
And now Bloomberg SHOWS the Koch Brothers oil refinery, "Paying" -$0.50 For North Dakota Crude [yes, that’s NEGATIVE fifty cents per barrel].
“…the crude glut is now so acute that the Koch brothers are actually charging 0.50/bbl to take low grade oil at their Flint Hills Resources refining arm.”
CAT FIGHT ALERT:
zh alleged that “Dallas Fed members had met with banks in Houston and explicitly ‘told them not to force energy bankruptcies’ and to demand asset sales instead.” Further, zh alleged that the FED suspended “mark to market” rules for energy debt. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-1 ... orce-shale
Elsewhere: WFC, the largest U.S. mortgage lender, disclosed in last week’s conference call that they have $17 billion in outstanding energy loans, the majority of which is rated junk, and they “set aside” $1.2 billion (7%) in “loan loss reserves” to cover losses in the oil and gas portfolio.