Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
THANKS boss for always updating us on gold. I appreciateJFR wrote:The little annoyances. Gonna dump my gold ETFs before the close....
I don't understand, I thought the Corona virus IS a type of flu. But the larger point is a good one, and I just read a great piece by Danny Riley (Mr.TopStep) or someone on his site, that it is the SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTION, and not the mortality numbers themselves, which is so alarming to the financial markets. Especially in a global just-in-time trade manufacturing environment.Fieldydwb wrote:more people die from the flu? Not relevant.
People wanting to leave Earth. Now THAT is panic.ccash04 wrote:Amazingly, SPCE is up!
You are welcome. It's a must watch, Pasta Boss.Al_Dente wrote:THANKS boss for always updating us on gold. I appreciateJFR wrote:The little annoyances. Gonna dump my gold ETFs before the close....
/GC has a topping candle and a Demark Sequential count of "7" ...JFR wrote:The little annoyances. Gonna dump my gold ETFs before the close.
I am out of the gold ETFs for now. Gonna have to watch and probably play some ES overnight. Have a good afternoon, Everyone.QED wrote:/GC has a topping candle and a Demark Sequential count of "7" ...JFR wrote:The little annoyances. Gonna dump my gold ETFs before the close.
.
WHO say flu kills 290,000 to 650,000 people per year globallyDaniel wrote:I don't understand, I thought the Corona virus IS a type of flu. But the larger point is a good one, and I just read a great piece by Danny Riley (Mr.TopStep) or someone on his site, that it is the SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTION, and not the mortality numbers themselves, which is so alarming to the financial markets. Especially in a global just-in-time trade manufacturing environment.Fieldydwb wrote:more people die from the flu? Not relevant.
It's not. It's completely different. There's a lot of "The flu has more deaths.." comments going around the internet and twitter-verse, those types of comments are rightfully getting squashed as meaningless. It's completely different and to say that is somewhat ignorant to the overall severity of this specific virus and its potential effects on the health care systems and further on the world economy re supply chains etc etc. The facts are that it will be a major burden on the health care systems of any countries that it becomes pandemic in as 15% of cases require 2-3 weeks of intensive care (intubations etc). Not that any of that is super relevant here re this is market talk but yeah, I'd just take heed thinking this will go away and say its Bullsa! Ramifications are much greater. If it really was that the flu was a greater risk, well, you wouldn't see the response China did. They wouldn't shut down their economy for that. So yeah...there's that. Maybe traffic deaths will be less due to everyone staying in as someone else said. Who knows. I was just stating a fact...zero personal attack..not sure why I got that in response..Daniel wrote:I don't understand, I thought the Corona virus IS a type of flu. But the larger point is a good one, and I just read a great piece by Danny Riley (Mr.TopStep) or someone on his site, that it is the SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTION, and not the mortality numbers themselves, which is so alarming to the financial markets. Especially in a global just-in-time trade manufacturing environment.Fieldydwb wrote:more people die from the flu? Not relevant.
Your wording was ambiguous. I personally didn't read it as the individual’s comment being dismissed rudely as “irrelevant”, but rather as general Flu statistics not being an appropriate standard to measure Corona social medical and economic harm--and hence not relevant. But I can see the ambiguity.Fieldydwb wrote:It's not. It's completely different....Daniel wrote:I don't understand, I thought the Corona virus IS a type of flu.Fieldydwb wrote:more people die from the flu? Not relevant.
I was just stating a fact...zero personal attack..not sure why I got that in response.