SWalsh wrote:taggard wrote:the problem with creating liquidity and at the same time trying to force austerity at the same time is that masses of people are crushed
"Crushed" indeed! Hussman had a report out in October showing what the Quantitative Easing did in Japan over its many attempts. For every dollar put in the velocity of money slowed. The net affect was that it did nothing. I suspect ours is only different, for a while at least, as there is a quid pro quo that they are to buy equities.
My kids went to a top University and have fine degrees and are now lucky to be working at less than half the pay they would have received 5 years ago. And my family has a number of LEO in it. That "Thin Blue Line" is a lot thinner than people realize. I stridently oppose the OWS movement as they should be before Congress and the president with the loons removed. I know that the police are quite worried about what they will be able to do to maintain law-and-order if there are cutbacks in both pensions and benefits to the poor.
What does this have to do with the markets? I think it's all factored into keeping the mkt elevated. I have an economist friend who is razor sharp and teaches. He's not one of those shills on CNBC who always say stocks are undervalued. He said it is quite easy to make a case that the fair value of the S&P is under 500. He drafted a course of booms and busts in history after reading Reinhardrt and Rogoff's "It's Different This Time", which cover 600+ years of economies and over 250 collapses. He can't, and won't, say that it's coming next week or in 5 years. But you can't kick debt of this magnitude down the road. All debt gets paid through massive inflation or default. Perhaps Kondratiev is right and winter is starting as each generation thinks they are smarter than the ones who screwed it up in theirs.
Here's the kicker....what happens if they are able to print paper worldwide AND like in the 80s, people buy things as they will be more expensive next year? Then while in real-terms you lose value in all assets, stocks do rise. Does this government care if more people look to it for sustenance? Oh I don't think so. I'm glad the Greatest Generation is widely gone. They gave to much for us to be in this state of confusion now.
[last soapbox post of the day]
while govs are an issue maybe the larger issue is the derivatives market. in effect banks are holding govs hostage. most voters buy into the idea that more money is good in good times--you certainly are going to get it during bad times.
this stuff is less focused (in my opinion) and more a general state of mind. derivatives and liquidity are like nano tech. (1) you can't turn back the clock (2) in many ways more people world wide--eg developing countries--are overall (ge over 20-30 years) better off. (3) but just as nano tech can do great stuff tiny particles can lodge in your brain. or eyes.
Derivatives and other liquidity (one report says 29 trillion from us fed and treasury in money/loans/guarantees/buying bad debt (go bac) are like cancer. there is no logic to the progression as they are just going to kill the host--or seriously damage him. But what's key is everyone is trying to get into the Kool-aid bowl and this is a more general condition that everyone likes to admit. we like the idea of a unified field theory--but then you have string theory. it's a mess.
as for your kids--the hard part is to teach them to benefit from these sorts of changes--AT THE SAME TIME not lose their sanity soul whatever to it.
they need to look where others don't--the good news is that most people are looking in the same place. best of luck to you and your kids