Cobra's Market View

still in the channel, pop up? yellow triangle for the rest of the year?..break down yellow bear flag, and H&S still in play.

Xian wrote:

rc1269 wrote:

Xian wrote:

rc1269 wrote:

TraderJoe wrote: hmm probably doesn't have much to do with the fact the market had declined about 40% the twelve months heading into Obama's election, and Bush took over at the height of the tech bubble...

Don't want to get into this, but please know that Bush didn't "take over" (great choice of words) at "the height of the tech bubble." NAZ peaked in March 2000. GW became POTUS Jan '01.

"don't want to get into this" immediately followed by getting into it. classic. we all know you love big O; you've made that abundantly clear for a long time. and in similar fashion, spend more time caring about words than substance. apologies for typing too fast while i hold down a real job on the side - is this better for you: "Bush assumed the role of President 15% from the market peak and still up 192% over the prior 6 years" ?
there, i feel much better that i've got all the words straight. now, which UAW chapter can i send my next bailout check to?

This is what I mean, "didn't want to get into it" Just thought I'd give you a simple fact. Relax.

I don't love O, I show respect for the President of the United States because I am a patriot regardless who who sits in the oval, unlike some. And I've said all along the electoral math favors O, 'cuz it did.

I really like how you choose to modify the time frame for his years in office. Yes, excluding the crash and if you don't count all the time he was POTUS, but just some of the time he was POTUS the market did great during that time that you've picked out. I agree.

i'm relaxed. i "modified" the timeframe to make the point i attempted to make earlier, since my lack of chronological specificity made the concept too difficult to grasp. the basic gist is that one took office around the time of the cyclical peak and the other around the time of a cyclical low. the article i was referencing alluded to performance just months and up to one year after election. it had nothing to do with all the other time during anyone's presidency, therefore neither did my comparison.
this is the first i've opinined in any political way. and you? you can spare the "just thought i'd give you a simple fact": "(great choice of words)", "unlike some", "If only you guys were as good at governing as naming things, we might one day actually get a decent right wing stock market." if you want us to believe you are simply giving facts, then simply give facts.
okay i'm done, moving on to something to things people care about

I don't know if anyone saw this yesterday. May be worth a peek:

From Cory's site: Charting the SP500 Outcome of Elections Past

http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/charting- ... om+Blog%29

Oh crap!!

!!!!!!POWER HOUR!!!!!!

TraderGirl wrote:it doesn't mean I like unions...they 'f' up the jobs in this country...too much pay for non-educated workers drive up prices for goods, less competitive with other countries, etc, etc,

TraderGirl & I have a belief in common.

TraderGirl wrote:Romney sends our jobs overseas rather than attempting to fix the problem

Obama sent Chrysler jobs to China (I thought it was gonna be Leningrad) & Italy. Obama outsourced Benghazi's security to Libyans and four of our men are dead. Barry knows all about outsourcing.

well, double top target met.

TraderGirl wrote:

rc1269 wrote:

TraderGirl wrote:Let's not get into political discussions, because I can sit here and talk about how Obama is a more ethical and intelligent leader thinking about having a better future for our country and how Romney is calculating, devious and will only act on issues that will improve "his" bottom line, whether that means shipping jobs to China or overseas, while hurting our country in the process...but I won't do that...let's get down to business....

hahaha touche

there is nothing to touche about...even if I think Obama is the better person, the better president...the better leader...it doesn't mean I like unions...they 'f' up the jobs in this country...too much pay for non-educated workers drive up prices for goods, less competitive with other countries, etc, etc, I could go on and on, but I won't because Romney sends our jobs overseas rather than attempting to fix the problem...so would you rather have ethics and standards and someone who attempts to look out for the people of this country, or a lying, cheating, sob that couldn't give a "sh!#" about you or anyone else but himself....???

the chuckle and "touche" was in regards to the "let's not get into political discussions..." immediately followed by a political discussion

and i don't disagree with anything you've said. my criticism's of Obama shouldn't be construed as an endorsment for Romney. I'm pretty sure I never said I liked him any more or less

still on the channel support though. I'm neutral.

Petsamo wrote:

TraderGirl wrote:it doesn't mean I like unions...they 'f' up the jobs in this country...too much pay for non-educated workers drive up prices for goods, less competitive with other countries, etc, etc,

TraderGirl & I have a belief in common.

TraderGirl wrote:Romney sends our jobs overseas rather than attempting to fix the problem

Obama sent Chrysler jobs to China (I thought it was gonna be Leningrad) & Italy. Obama outsourced Benghazi's security to Libyans and four of our men are dead. Barry knows all about outsourcing.

Romney's list is too long for me to post here...I have too much bad 'sh!#" I have seen him do...let's just say he's a mean mother f'er...

Let's get back to work...

That rocket ramping up was a fluke.

Ain't no more...

MrMiyagi wrote:Oh crap!!

!!!!!!POWER HOUR!!!!!!

Me XMan wrote:Ain't no more...

MrMiyagi wrote:Oh crap!!

!!!!!!POWER HOUR!!!!!!

AGAIN, Mr M do you have one of these everyday?

rc1269 wrote:

TraderGirl wrote:

rc1269 wrote:

TraderGirl wrote:Let's not get into political discussions, because I can sit here and talk about how Obama is a more ethical and intelligent leader thinking about having a better future for our country and how Romney is calculating, devious and will only act on issues that will improve "his" bottom line, whether that means shipping jobs to China or overseas, while hurting our country in the process...but I won't do that...let's get down to business....

hahaha touche

there is nothing to touche about...even if I think Obama is the better person, the better president...the better leader...it doesn't mean I like unions...they 'f' up the jobs in this country...too much pay for non-educated workers drive up prices for goods, less competitive with other countries, etc, etc, I could go on and on, but I won't because Romney sends our jobs overseas rather than attempting to fix the problem...so would you rather have ethics and standards and someone who attempts to look out for the people of this country, or a lying, cheating, sob that couldn't give a "sh!#" about you or anyone else but himself....???

the chuckle and "touche" was in regards to the "let's not get into political discussions..." immediately followed by a political discussion

and i don't disagree with anything you've said. my criticism's of Obama shouldn't be construed as an endorsment for Romney. I'm pretty sure I never said I liked him any more or less

Yes, I was being sarcastic... saying I was not going to get political, then get political..you are a man...you are supposed to get sarcasm..at least that is what Daniel-david says...

Let's just all get along... See this is what happens when politics and religion are discussed...words get misconstrued...

TraderGirl-- you're terrific -- glad to be the same gender. Go girl! Romney is a self-serving liar. I would love to see his other tax returns and his semi-legal profit sources which he endorses as "capitalism."

Petsamo wrote:

TraderGirl wrote:it doesn't mean I like unions...they 'f' up the jobs in this country...too much pay for non-educated workers drive up prices for goods, less competitive with other countries, etc, etc,

TraderGirl & I have a belief in common.

TraderGirl wrote:Romney sends our jobs overseas rather than attempting to fix the problem

Obama sent Chrysler jobs to China (I thought it was gonna be Leningrad) & Italy. Obama outsourced Benghazi's security to Libyans and four of our men are dead. Barry knows all about outsourcing.

Pets, are you serious or doing like an ironic impression of a Fox Watcher?

Now, the Chrysler thing, that's just the right-wing echo camber banging around lies that no reasonable person believes.

But this Libya thing, it's despicable. Remember when 9/11 happened and how Bush got memos all summer telling him of an imminent attack, then he didn't understand so the they to turn the PDB into a history lesson for him and actually titled it "Bin Laden Determined to attack the US," then they had to send a guy down to his ranch to make him read it and he said, "OK, yo've covered your ass. you can go." Then he went out and played golf?

And after all that DEMs rallied around their president. After 9/11 Bush's approval ratings went into the 90s.

The saddest thing about this Libya mess is the Republicans have PROVEN that they lack the patriotism to rally around the POTUS in times deep international crisis or attacks on America as the DEMs did.

You should be ashamed, and the worst part is that you're not.

I'm just going to put you back on ignore. Not because you are misinformed or distracting, but because you are deeply unAmerican and unpatriotic and it makes me sad. Honestly sad. Pathetic.

We are screwed regardless of who the president is so it seems like a moot point to me.

TraderGirl wrote:Romney's list is too long for me to post here...I have too much bad 'sh!#" I have seen him do...let's just say he's a mean mother f'er...

And you don't see the carnage Obama is leaving behind. You gotta quit hanging out with your leftist buddies.

skittlesmds wrote:We are screwed regardless of who the president is so it seems like a moot point to me.

you'll like this then.

http://www.thereformedbroker.com/2012/1 ... of-choice/

WOW, ONLY 10 MORE MINUTES

I was led to belive this was a trading web site,I guess i am wrong..Ps is G.Bush ahead??????