Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
Someone who cannot properly explain their strategy doesn't understand it themselves, or they don't have the ability to articulate it well enough so that someone can understand. And then when they turn it around and attack someone who is asking questions, well that's usually insecurity speaking to deflect their inability to respond in an intelligent manner. Calls 100% accurate....that's a big stretch...ALdaytrade wrote: "Whenever anyone posts on this forum, they are asked questions, if their chart or theory is not able to be understood. Every person has answered those questions with politeness and clarity. However, in the case of FlowerGirl, if you ask her a question she ignores you. Or, if she does answer it is with sarcasm and arrogance. I am tired of it. So, you are actually telling FlowerGirl that her rudeness is acceptable? You are describing the people who are objecting and asking her not to be rude as "distracting petty criticism from weaklings?" Someone who is rude and is deameaning to others, is actually a bully, so you are blaming the victims? This is hard to accept. I do not care if her calls on the market are 100% accurate, you are accepting poor behaviour and mean behaviour as a trade for market calls? Give your head a shake. No wonder people of expert opinions leave this forum. They do not put up with this type of behavior."
Dude, I don't see any predictive indications on your chart?? Anyone can draw support resistance lines...that's all I see...so where does it give your predictive indications?? Don't see it...FlowerGirl wrote:Some of you are so consumed in tarnishing the poster that they fail to see what is being offered. They repeatedly mention about the "after the fact" but fail to show any example. On the contrary I have provided evidence of predictive nature of my posts at multiple occasions, some as recent as yesterday, and here I present another evidence.
Look at this post and tell me as to why the price is stalling at this level?
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1323&sd=d&start=20#p164054
Longer term: It has a history of painful drawdowns, so a stop-loss is essential, even a little MA will work fineL_T wrote: ... .....maybe a weekly holding period would be better than a daily?
It's got a pretty good "buy and forget about it" track record since the debt ceiling stuff from late summer 2011.
Kongen, neither myself or ADT are being sanctimonious....give me a break...kongen wrote:ALdaytrade and TraderGirl – For the gods’ sake, stop your sanctimonious hate-fest and leave it alone! You are wrong AND boring.
Hi Kenya -KENA wrote:Chart by stocktiming showing the DOW going higher on less and less volume.
Yo TraderGirl:TraderGirl wrote: .....
Hey Cobra, there is arguing, then there is calling out bad behavior...Cobra wrote:Well, guys, I know it's boring but arguing doesn't make boring day fun, so stop now, please. thanks.
...And we now return to the soothing sounds of K-Cobra 105 FM, "Where your money goes to breed"Cobra wrote:Well, guys, I know it's boring but arguing doesn't make boring day fun, so stop now, please. thanks.
TuttiTutti wrote:Hi Kenya -KENA wrote:Chart by stocktiming showing the DOW going higher on less and less volume[/attachment]
its a quiet Friday, so I did a little rough math (very rough). If you look at volume as total dollars exchanged and not total shares, we are well within the 5 year avg. Additionally if we use a smoothed 50 day avg volume, there is > 25% more money trading hands as of 5/16/2014 than at the lows of 2009.
Granted, this was done very, very quickly and one can pick multiple issues with it, but I think it proves its point that not everything is as it seems.
*EDIT - note that % changes are shown in absolute values, you can easily see which way the wind was blowing.
The top dozen or so stocks are pulling the sled.Tutti wrote:Hi Kenya -KENA wrote:Chart by stocktiming showing the DOW going higher on less and less volume.
its a quiet Friday, so I did a little rough math (very rough). If you look at volume as total dollars exchanged and not total shares, we are well within the 5 year avg. Additionally if we use a smoothed 50 day avg volume, there is > 25% more money trading hands as of 5/16/2014 than at the lows of 2009.
Granted, this was done very, very quickly and one can pick multiple issues with it, but I think it proves its point that not everything is as it seems.
*EDIT - note that % changes are shown in absolute values, you can easily see which way the wind was blowing.
Sent you a PM..Al_Dente wrote:Yo TraderGirl:TraderGirl wrote: .....
I really have missed your posts and your EW counts
btw: do I need to apologize to you for, you know, anything?
I will if u need me to