Buckethead wrote:imho, the tape is reminiscent of late 2010. i came in this week as a bear, but if bulls can manage a consolidation this week, more upside to 1340-1350 is quite possible. from what i can see, the majority wants a pullback for various reasons. they are short or want to get long on a dip... i have lost money this week churning on this tite low volume tape. going to wait for resolution of trend.
judging by posts here and other places "the majority want's a pull back" seems about right at least in posts. and the poll also supported that. using the weekly qqq as an example--it seems possible to hit the last (major) high we are only 1 point away. and blowing stops is a way of life in this market.
also method i used take a proposed feb down move of some sort--often (in a flat to up market) takes forever and is hugely painful in terms of losses. out of 15 events in the last 1.80 years there were 3 major failures--2 strange long ugly marginal workable events and 12 very strong wins. the main idea i get out of this is that any shorts in a flat or rising market (with this idea) are going to require epic time. as in 2-6 weeks to play out. and have a decent chance of total failure.
what's making life so hard for everyone is trying to anticipate the end of the trend. Cobra has often noted that it's best not to fight. this is a very important idea and i have watched people in 2009 and 2010 get whacked for months. these were not ignorant or stupid people--they were very decent traders most of the time (and did well in 2011 for example). many of us are very serious about working on our technical abilities--and you frequently see a lot of emotion on this and other sites with serious traders. huge amounts of energy are often expended in these situations--also people often become more solidified in their attempts and positions.
when this happens we forget what the entire basis of ta is--and that is to actually see the market. all the volume divergence etc is of importance--but whatever is going on--goes on until it changes. when it changes something else starts.
all this may seem sort of obvious or boring--but it's also key.
risk is not some actual thing entirely outside people--it's a perception based event. generally the problem in life is that what we perceive as "low risk" is not. and often what we perceive as "high risk" is not for one of several reasons. in high risk we often avoid taking action or are insanely careful if we have to proceed in spite of ourselves--hence risk is effectively lower or is hedged. what we see as low risk (example-eating a so-so diet/getting stressed etc) is higher risk for most people in.
taking my favorite example--i often cross streets in the middle (eg jaywalk) but prior to do this look around a lot for cars. i see people blindly staring at the walk light (not unlike buying and holding in 401k because the market always goes up 10% a year on average)and stepping into oncoming traffic secure because the little light told them to and they are inside the lines. sadly many people in cars mess up at stoplights and crosswalks. so what is most dangerous? and why is it dangerous or not?
so bottom line is no matter how solid our trading and ta work is--keep an eye on the things that "aren't important" such as ignoring oncoming trucks and getting "emotional"or thinking we are not getting "emotional".
ps--i have seen on this and other sites the idea that there are few buyers (eg divergences prove this) but there are also few sellers and this idea has shown up no place i saw. one interesting survey from bac (institutional investors" risk-on in 2012") shows that 3% of "asset allocation specialists" (oh man) with 818 billion in assets figure the global economy would weaken in the next 12 months. you hate seeing that skew esp with a title like AAS. other stories indicated last year was the worst in a while for hedge funds and that mutual funds suffered hard core withdrawals. maybe the AAS guys coupled with the mutual fund guys mean we go to 1500--but 3%?
good luck with your trades