Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
Hahhaha, funniest line I heard all week.SB73 wrote:I just took a screen shot of apple being red so I can show it to my grandkids.
stucap wrote:Another triangle. 99.999999% chance it breaks to the upside. 0.0000001% to the downside. Play against the casino at your own risk (and beware of a move down because that is just another dip to be bought)!
Thx richer. Homage to the King with some shaded boxes:richer wrote:I like your posts, very good. Thanks.
He uses "Elliott Wave". It appears he has his own version of Elliott Wave counting that has labels placed to fit his market bias from some charts I have seen as there are clear rules violations. With QE1, 2, 3....99, I guess it has been easy to label everything up an impulse wave and all dips corrections and appear to be right. He started doing this in mid-2009. But nothing works properly with the HFT/Algos now overwhelming the markets. I received an e-mail this morning from a friend who said that looking at the latest DeMark signal he thinks all but one of the last 10 signals on the monthly, weekly, and daily have been immediately broken. I was told mutual funds had been using that methodology for short-term trading. What better way than to know someone with less money than you just put a position on?SB73 wrote:FWIW I see that PUG is calling for a quick correction to maybe the 1320ish area followed by a move back to 1400 to 1450ish.
It's red because there are no more buyers and very few shorts to be squeezed.TraderGirl wrote:Here is an article that may explain why Apple is in red....for the time being that is...
http://www.digitimes.com/pda/a20120301PD203.html
Thanks for the comments. I don't really trust EW maybe because I have mainly studies it over the last couple of years and can't seem to get to any conclusions other than there are no conclusions.SWalsh wrote:He uses "Elliott Wave". It appears he has his own version of Elliott Wave counting that has labels placed to fit his market bias from some charts I have seen as there are clear rules violations. With QE1, 2, 3....99, I guess it has been easy to label everything up an impulse wave and all dips corrections and appear to be right. He started doing this in mid-2009. But nothing works properly with the HFT/Algos now overwhelming the markets. I received an e-mail this morning from a friend who said that looking at the latest DeMark signal he thinks all but one of the last 10 signals on the monthly, weekly, and daily have been immediately broken. I was told mutual funds had been using that methodology for short-term trading. What better way than to know someone with less money than you just put a position on?SB73 wrote:FWIW I see that PUG is calling for a quick correction to maybe the 1320ish area followed by a move back to 1400 to 1450ish.
In a BTFD world, anyone saying "UP" can be right, despite the analysis being wrong.
I saw a Glenn Neely chart about 2 months ago stating that if the patterns he had were broken he was probably not going to trade SPY or /ES for perhaps a year as it's in a corrective phase and trying to label charts in this environment was becoming senseless. I don't follow him so I don't know if he stuck to his guns with that. He had done quite well with the metals and the Euro from what a subscriber told me.