Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
Welcome aboard.BenAndLloyd wrote:First post here..
Cobra, Do you have an estimate on how low we are going to go? Thanks for the wonderful site.
No, I work for a small quant firm, we do things totally differently. I visit your site for my own benefits. I had to learn all TA stuff and my firm will not use TACobra wrote:your boss should pay me for you guys visiting my sites at least he should help promoting my sites.q2model wrote:Cobra wrote:thanks, that's feel better. I should never check outside my own web sites, except those serious TA bloggers of course.quientuves wrote:Cobra, don't let your pride mess with business. If all the people think you are awesome, all will try to follow you, and it's then when you'll suck.
So, it's better this way. We now you are the best or, at least, among the very bests. And it's better for us if this FACT is not recognized by a lot of people...
But there is something i don't accept: if they copy your calls and then piss off.
Cobra: I wish my boss had your insights, our fund would have done much betterYou belong to that WX trading group right? Forgive me, if I remember wrong.
Cobra wrote:
I checked the wenxuecity, some of them kept saying that I was wrong most of the time and my statistics are useless. All in all I'm the worst ever analyst. All my hard working analysis is no match with their single word shouted in every few days. I was very offended. And I'm very confident if my analysis is this bad, then how come I have a 40,000 unique IP visitors every month? Does that mean you guys are idiot (since I'm the worst ever)?
Two great trade setups just the same as yesterday. Not sure if the Long will work as well as it did yesterday. Now time to read all your great posts.jarbo456 wrote:i forget the exact numbers, but i do remember buffet bought $5BB in GS at the end of Sept. '08. if i remember, with his priced in discounts and warrants, his share price was around $115.shumushu wrote:hahah, well said. What is interesting is that it is hard to believe market would even react this way to stupid news like 5Billion buffet etc..Cobra wrote:Europe is celebrating the deal too, oh, wait a minue, may be I should put the chart upside down?
obviously, two months later, GS hit a low of $47.
i can't lie, i am getting short squeezed on BAC, so i'm biased, but i can only hope that Buffet is simply telling me the worst is ahead of us.
sorry for remember incorrectly. I was wondering because if you belong to the group I referred too, how dare you said that because apparently the boss of that group visits this site too.q2model wrote:No, I work for a small quant firm, we do things totally differently. I visit your site for my own benefits. I had to learn all TA stuff and my firm will not use TACobra wrote:your boss should pay me for you guys visiting my sites at least he should help promoting my sites.q2model wrote:Cobra wrote:thanks, that's feel better. I should never check outside my own web sites, except those serious TA bloggers of course.quientuves wrote:Cobra, don't let your pride mess with business. If all the people think you are awesome, all will try to follow you, and it's then when you'll suck.
So, it's better this way. We now you are the best or, at least, among the very bests. And it's better for us if this FACT is not recognized by a lot of people...
But there is something i don't accept: if they copy your calls and then piss off.
Cobra: I wish my boss had your insights, our fund would have done much betterYou belong to that WX trading group right? Forgive me, if I remember wrong.
almost identical deal with goldman, except for the the 10% dividend vs. 6% on the BAC preferred. both deals were preferred (which act more like bonds - but are still considered part of the equity lien), and both are callable, the GS preferred callable at a 10% premium and the BAC at 5% premium.StrikePrice wrote:Two great trade setups just the same as yesterday. Not sure if the Long will work as well as it did yesterday. Now time to read all your great posts.jarbo456 wrote:i forget the exact numbers, but i do remember buffet bought $5BB in GS at the end of Sept. '08. if i remember, with his priced in discounts and warrants, his share price was around $115.shumushu wrote:hahah, well said. What is interesting is that it is hard to believe market would even react this way to stupid news like 5Billion buffet etc..Cobra wrote:Europe is celebrating the deal too, oh, wait a minue, may be I should put the chart upside down?
obviously, two months later, GS hit a low of $47.
i can't lie, i am getting short squeezed on BAC, so i'm biased, but i can only hope that Buffet is simply telling me the worst is ahead of us.
jarbo456,
I may be remembering incorrectly, but I believe Buffet bought Goldman Bonds with a 10% yield guarantee. So I'm not sure the stock situation equates. I hope you can get out of the BAC trade on the next major pullback.
I don't think the Obama admin had anything to do with the Buffet deal. They haven't proven to be that savvy. It is likely Buffet may have said something to Obama and it got leaked into the market to truncate the Wave 5 down which in theory leads to a 100% retrace of the Wave 5, though this deep pullback today leads to me to think the only way we now get to 1208 is with a surprise in GDP and some of Ben's finely crafted words. Have to see how this Wave 4 works out and whether we get the breakdown as many are looking for. We'd then switch it over to a A-B-C with Wave 1 down having started this morning.
rejected at 1167. fighting for support around 1161. i am expecting 1 more try to the upside.soku wrote:if 1166.5 taken, i will bet for 1172nonabear wrote:Cobra and others,
Any target on how high we rebound...back up to 1172 on the ES???...or higher
Thanks
looks like flag breakout on the 1minute.BullBear52x wrote:Bear flag
I dare not say that, seems too large.shumushu wrote:Cobra, measured move down from the morning?
Cobra, using rough rule of thumb Maths, and relating to current FTSE picture, that would pull the FTSE back to approx 5000 level, which would meet a wave d of a triangle requirement, allowing for two leg lower high (wave e of the triangle completing a 4th wave), before a much larger fall to retest and drop below the lows of 9th August (namely a 5th wave down.)Cobra wrote:well, hopefully this is the 2nd leg down I talked. I expect at least yesterday's low to be tested.