Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
Cobra wrote:resistances. Not sure if it will have any tiny effects here. the lesson: surprise is always with bulls. bears? hmm, don't even mention it...
at least the bulls want the 200d recaptured 2064.. daily still an inside day… so faruempel wrote:MA 20 is at 2075 and I presume SPX wants to end the week at 2075 or slightly above that level ...
Boss, as I was using dataraderpro, it looks to me breadth data is off? any chance you have other source to confirm their data? The internal looks very weak.fehro wrote:SPX .. possible resistance.. RUT weak
if accurate in its forecast, we have over *6 months to jump on that bandwagon and still be deep, deep , deep in the money.fehro wrote:this chart has been floating around for the last few days.. for uber bulls. http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2015/12/to ... -g-stocks/
what I got.. cumulative volume not confirming SPX up move .. yet, as TRIN climbs.. adv/dec strong -ish McClellan still negativejosephli wrote:Boss, as I was using dataraderpro, it looks to me breadth data is off? any chance you have other source to confirm their data? The internal looks very weak.fehro wrote:SPX .. possible resistance.. RUT weak
I personally don't think the chart has too much value. First it only contains four stocks (very small sample size). Second the fundamentals of those company looks very different. Not saying FANG not a good investment, but I don't think those performance will repeat.fehro wrote:this chart has been floating around for the last few days.. for uber bulls. http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2015/12/to ... -g-stocks/
also Put/Call ratio's CPC / CPCE a near extremes.. 0.60fehro wrote:what I got.. cumulative volume not confirming SPX up move .. yet, as TRIN climbs.. adv/dec strong -ish McClellan still negativejosephli wrote:Boss, as I was using dataraderpro, it looks to me breadth data is off? any chance you have other source to confirm their data? The internal looks very weak.fehro wrote:SPX .. possible resistance.. RUT weak
yup.. not sure how advertising clicks, and FB likes, and TV and shopping help the economy…. as much as business hardware, chips, phones, business software, modemsjosephli wrote:I personally don't think the chart has too much value. First it only contains four stocks (very small sample size). Second the fundamentals of those company looks very different. Not saying FANG not a good investment, but I don't think those performance will repeat.fehro wrote:this chart has been floating around for the last few days.. for uber bulls. http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2015/12/to ... -g-stocks/
So the names of the hedge fund hotels change from cycle to cycle but the story line is always the same. The critical point to me is that last time Sir Alan was pouring gasoline on the fire, but this time Super Mario and Grandma are trying to put it out. Would a Square IPO have gone so wrong back then?josephli wrote:I personally don't think the chart has too much value. First it only contains four stocks (very small sample size). Second the fundamentals of those company looks very different. Not saying FANG not a good investment, but I don't think those performance will repeat.fehro wrote:this chart has been floating around for the last few days.. for uber bulls. http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2015/12/to ... -g-stocks/