usctrojan99 wrote:I don't ever recall a time where the market went down while Bernanke speaks. I bought 5 SPY 133 calls at 1.45 and sold at 1.96 for a quick scalp.
Trend is up - don't fight the tape. Bears will have their day, just not yet.
Nice move...scalped the metals for similar results.
thanos wrote:Man those HFT are sure buying up this market. Damn those HFT are crazy traders.
That's a seriously ignorant analysis. Given that last night you called this board a group of HS dropout losers, what do you think, you are amusing?
thanos wrote:
Yes it is insightful if you understand it. You can follow all the charts in the world and it won't tell you a thing about tomorrow. I find it laughable when i read these forums and people talking about HFT and everything else they know absolutely nothing about. Or the folks that look at sometime like the TRIN and its magic predictive power. LOL! The majority of the high school drop outs here with their disillusions of day trading for a live have zero clue as to how these indicators are even calculated. The EMA of the EMA of the EMA. That is laughable.
I hope the mortar work on your bridge you live under is fixed shortly so you can return to your residence, little man. Be sure to tip the Gumbies. http://wn.com/Monty_Python__The_architect_sketch
Just for the record Prechter advised his subscribers to go (leveraged!!!) short at about 1290 with a stop at 1360, on the basis on imminent major 3 down or whatever. I also have it on very good authority that EWI counts all conform to EW rules, however wildly wide of the mark they eventually turn out to be.
I'm no Prechter fan & personally think EWI should have given up forecasting a long time ago, but he hasn't had subs short from 1050 and his EW counts are all technically valid.
springheel_jack wrote:Just for the record Prechter advised his subscribers to go (leveraged!!!) short at about 1290 with a stop at 1360, on the basis on imminent major 3 down or whatever. I also have it on very good authority that EWI counts all conform to EW rules, however wildly wide of the mark they eventually turn out to be.
I'm no Prechter fan & personally think EWI should have given up forecasting a long time ago, but he hasn't had subs short from 1050 and his EW counts are all technically valid.
Prechter has proclaimed 3 of 3 of 3 of 3 of 3 several times over the past few years and they've all blown up in his face. And what does he do? Revise his count and try again just like any EW guy does. Difference is that Prechter core subscribers are permabears so he has a tendency to jump on short opportunities too early. Also, Prechter doesn't trade much of his own money just prognosticates and collects oodles of subscription fees.
Like to read more of my commentaries? Please subscribe my Daily Market Report. Subscribers can find all the members only posts HERE. StockCharts members, please vote for me HERE, thanks.
springheel_jack wrote:Just for the record Prechter advised his subscribers to go (leveraged!!!) short at about 1290 with a stop at 1360, on the basis on imminent major 3 down or whatever. I also have it on very good authority that EWI counts all conform to EW rules, however wildly wide of the mark they eventually turn out to be.
I'm no Prechter fan & personally think EWI should have given up forecasting a long time ago, but he hasn't had subs short from 1050 and his EW counts are all technically valid.
Prechter has proclaimed 3 of 3 of 3 of 3 of 3 several times over the past few years and they've all blown up in his face. And what does he do? Revise his count and try again just like any EW guy does. Difference is that Prechter core subscribers are permabears so he has a tendency to jump on short opportunities too early. Also, Prechter doesn't trade much of his own money just prognosticates and collects oodles of subscription fees.
I'm not defending his record, just the opposite.
My understanding by the way is that Prechter does not trade himself as he's (cough) a better analyst than trader. A wise decision there if that's true.
i have his book though & he's a decent author if you ignore all the multi-century wave rubbish.
I posted this chart on the weekend watering, not bad (bragging) well intraday sell triggered, lets see if indicators will take us anywhere. so far the MM manage to do the opposite. sell double top and have to trade <134.61 to confirm the sell.
here is the double top I talked about
Last edited by BullBear52x on Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My comments are for entertainment/educational purpose only. NOT a trade advice.
BullBear52x wrote:I posted this chart on the weekend watering, not bad (bragging) well intraday sell triggered, lets see if indicators will take us anywhere. so far the MM manage to do the opposite. sell double top and have to trade <134.61 to confirm the sell.
BullBear52x wrote:I posted this chart on the weekend watering, not bad (bragging) well intraday sell triggered, lets see if indicators will take us anywhere. so far the MM manage to do the opposite. sell double top and have to trade <134.61 to confirm the sell.
If this is wave 4 from this morning's low (implying this drop at 12:30 is a correction) it would be 4x the time of wave 2 which while not a rules violation, is not often seen: