ClarkW wrote:$NATGAS Weekly. Brown trendline rejected price. The lime green trendline goes back to 1992. Would be perfect to see it drop below it to about 38% fib level, staying within the channel and heading higher. Talk about wishful thinking
Hi Clark,
Have you taken a short position in natural gas?
DTES
Educational only and not trading advice (EO&NTA) Good trading to all
ClarkW wrote:Cobra, to piggy back on one of the stocks that are on your long screen report. Here's an interesting article on STZ regarding a December pattern that has worked 19 of 20 times. Article also includes patterns for other stocks in December. http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analy ... z2EUwmW5Fv
Thanks.
Like to read more of my commentaries? Please subscribe my Daily Market Report. Subscribers can find all the members only posts HERE. StockCharts members, please vote for me HERE, thanks.
ClarkW wrote:$NATGAS Weekly. Brown trendline rejected price. The lime green trendline goes back to 1992. Would be perfect to see it drop below it to about 38% fib level, staying within the channel and heading higher. Talk about wishful thinking
Hi Clark,
Have you taken a short position in natural gas?
DTES
I bought a 1/4 position in KOLD on Thursday so yes, but not much.
First I want to thank ClarkW for reminding me of my goofiness on NG chart instead of ^NG.
to correct the mistake I throw in all of the future NG beneath UNG UNG shorter term is hanging by the cliff, do or die for the NG bulls I see strong suppor right about here. trading below 20.24 I will be really worry for bulls here.
The attachment 1.JPG is no longer available
The attachment 2.JPG is no longer available
Hi BB for me the big question is if the current decline is in 3 or 5waves, either way should bounce around 3.30 and the retrace of the bounce will tell a lot of which count is correct one but line in the sand is definitely 3.28. I am leaning slighty toward bearish case as price action from april lows looks more like a flat (3rd chart : viewtopic.php?f=2&t=750&p=107125#p107125) but nested 1-2 cannot be ruled out so far (until is above 3.28)
But definitely NG have a HUGE potential and that´s why I am watching it very closely especially potential falling wedge (chart 1)
My satisfaction always came from beating the market, solving the puzzle. The money was the reward, but it was not the main reason I loved the market (Jess Livermore)
Thanks for the video DTES. Would you venture to assign a probabiliy to a down week given that all astrological aspects are negative next week? BTW, I have a turn date on the 19th which at present looks like it will be a high.
AUD/JPY some kind of weakness is likely just around the corner
EDIT: There is a typo in text : like to test it
FXY
My satisfaction always came from beating the market, solving the puzzle. The money was the reward, but it was not the main reason I loved the market (Jess Livermore)
Hi KeiZai,
I love your charts.. Please keep us UP TO DATE on your NG & UNG charts.
Happy trading
KeiZai wrote:
BullBear52x wrote:Paging KeiZai on UNG and ^NG
First I want to thank ClarkW for reminding me of my goofiness on NG chart instead of ^NG.
to correct the mistake I throw in all of the future NG beneath UNG UNG shorter term is hanging by the cliff, do or die for the NG bulls I see strong suppor right about here. trading below 20.24 I will be really worry for bulls here.
1.JPG
2.JPG
Hi BB for me the big question is if the current decline is in 3 or 5waves, either way should bounce around 3.30 and the retrace of the bounce will tell a lot of which count is correct one but line in the sand is definitely 3.28. I am leaning slighty toward bearish case as price action from april lows looks more like a flat (3rd chart : viewtopic.php?f=2&t=750&p=107125#p107125) but nested 1-2 cannot be ruled out so far (until is above 3.28)
TraderJoe wrote:Hi KeiZai,
I love your charts.. Please keep us UP TO DATE on your NG & UNG charts.
Happy trading
KeiZai wrote:
BullBear52x wrote:Paging KeiZai on UNG and ^NG
First I want to thank ClarkW for reminding me of my goofiness on NG chart instead of ^NG.
to correct the mistake I throw in all of the future NG beneath UNG UNG shorter term is hanging by the cliff, do or die for the NG bulls I see strong suppor right about here. trading below 20.24 I will be really worry for bulls here.
1.JPG
2.JPG
Hi BB for me the big question is if the current decline is in 3 or 5waves, either way should bounce around 3.30 and the retrace of the bounce will tell a lot of which count is correct one but line in the sand is definitely 3.28. I am leaning slighty toward bearish case as price action from april lows looks more like a flat (3rd chart : viewtopic.php?f=2&t=750&p=107125#p107125) but nested 1-2 cannot be ruled out so far (until is above 3.28)
Still in Fiscal Cliff megaphone formation as far as I am concerned.
Potential dispersion of outcomes wider ahead than behind.
Could be good for day traders, which I am not.
Position traders should probably wait for extremes or resolution.
ClarkW wrote:$NATGAS Weekly. Brown trendline rejected price. The lime green trendline goes back to 1992. Would be perfect to see it drop below it to about 38% fib level, staying within the channel and heading higher. Talk about wishful thinking
Thanks very much folks I will try my best to keep u up to date
USD/CAD
This count fits best to cad imo, if so then is very close to bounce (risk off in equity market) before more weakness (risk on - near end of december?)
weekly
My satisfaction always came from beating the market, solving the puzzle. The money was the reward, but it was not the main reason I loved the market (Jess Livermore)
First I want to thank ClarkW for reminding me of my goofiness on NG chart instead of ^NG.
to correct the mistake I throw in all of the future NG beneath UNG UNG shorter term is hanging by the cliff, do or die for the NG bulls I see strong suppor right about here. trading below 20.24 I will be really worry for bulls here.
1.JPG
2.JPG
Hi BB for me the big question is if the current decline is in 3 or 5waves, either way should bounce around 3.30 and the retrace of the bounce will tell a lot of which count is correct one but line in the sand is definitely 3.28. I am leaning slighty toward bearish case as price action from april lows looks more like a flat (3rd chart : viewtopic.php?f=2&t=750&p=107125#p107125) but nested 1-2 cannot be ruled out so far (until is above 3.28)