OK, so much of the ascending triangle cases, now let's see rectangle case, the green line below must hold in order for this case to be valid.
Attachments
Like to read more of my commentaries? Please subscribe my Daily Market Report. Subscribers can find all the members only posts HERE. StockCharts members, please vote for me HERE, thanks.
Cobra wrote:OK, so much of the ascending triangle cases, now let's see rectangle case, the green line below must hold in order for this case to be valid.
cobra: I really want it to hold 117.64 which is the neckline for the reverse head and shoulders, and the important support from the 8/8 high. Love ya, man
Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor. This is just my opinion NOT investment advice.
varaamo wrote:Many Thanks rhight for sharing this.
Does Ned Davis have any similar indicator for determining tops of this intermediate runs? Looks like you subscribing to Ned Davis newsletter or something? If so, can you please share the type of subscription to their research. On their website, i noticed there are bunch of them.
rhight wrote:
I'm including a chart of one indicator that supposedly has a good track record and has not triggered since March 2009 (see bottom of chart.) The idea comes from "Technical Analysis" Kirkpatrick/Dahlquist page 147.
The Ned Davis data set is from 1966 to 2005, the chart is labeled "New Highs Minus New Lows / Issues Traded -- Five Day Smoothing" in which they label this zone "So Bad It's Good". The text reads, "It shows a particularly strong positive result when the ratio declines to below -13.8%. Otherwise, the results are mixed."
No, no, no. Ned Davis is way outside my pay grade. The info comes from the text book mentioned, one that I have read cover to cover and can recommend as well written. As far as tops and bottoms go, I like to say that bottoms don't last long, but tops drag on forever (relatively speaking).
Swing to Intermediate SPX Analysis - multiple time frame - Daily & 60 min time and price cycle analysis.
Usually trade SSO / SDS
oldpigwang wrote:Cobra Da: do you feel bearish by this big down bar?
I'm disappointed. so far the market only proves my forecast: this is just a rebound.
Like to read more of my commentaries? Please subscribe my Daily Market Report. Subscribers can find all the members only posts HERE. StockCharts members, please vote for me HERE, thanks.
Thanks for clarifying. Didn't know Ned Davis was expensive. Thanks for the book recommendation. I will get the book then.
One more question. When you say "tops drag on forever", then unlike your "Bottom detector", do you mean there is no reliable way for "Top Detector" ?
Many Thanks,
rhight wrote:
varaamo wrote:Many Thanks rhight for sharing this.
Does Ned Davis have any similar indicator for determining tops of this intermediate runs? Looks like you subscribing to Ned Davis newsletter or something? If so, can you please share the type of subscription to their research. On their website, i noticed there are bunch of them.
rhight wrote:
I'm including a chart of one indicator that supposedly has a good track record and has not triggered since March 2009 (see bottom of chart.) The idea comes from "Technical Analysis" Kirkpatrick/Dahlquist page 147.
The Ned Davis data set is from 1966 to 2005, the chart is labeled "New Highs Minus New Lows / Issues Traded -- Five Day Smoothing" in which they label this zone "So Bad It's Good". The text reads, "It shows a particularly strong positive result when the ratio declines to below -13.8%. Otherwise, the results are mixed."
No, no, no. Ned Davis is way outside my pay grade. The info comes from the text book mentioned, one that I have read cover to cover and can recommend as well written. As far as tops and bottoms go, I like to say that bottoms don't last long, but tops drag on forever (relatively speaking).
varaamo wrote:Many Thanks rhight for sharing this.
Does Ned Davis have any similar indicator for determining tops of this intermediate runs? Looks like you subscribing to Ned Davis newsletter or something? If so, can you please share the type of subscription to their research. On their website, i noticed there are bunch of them.
rhight wrote:
I'm including a chart of one indicator that supposedly has a good track record and has not triggered since March 2009 (see bottom of chart.) The idea comes from "Technical Analysis" Kirkpatrick/Dahlquist page 147.
The Ned Davis data set is from 1966 to 2005, the chart is labeled "New Highs Minus New Lows / Issues Traded -- Five Day Smoothing" in which they label this zone "So Bad It's Good". The text reads, "It shows a particularly strong positive result when the ratio declines to below -13.8%. Otherwise, the results are mixed."
No, no, no. Ned Davis is way outside my pay grade. The info comes from the text book mentioned, one that I have read cover to cover and can recommend as well written. As far as tops and bottoms go, I like to say that bottoms don't last long, but tops drag on forever (relatively speaking).
How much is Ned Davis services?
Like to read more of my commentaries? Please subscribe my Daily Market Report. Subscribers can find all the members only posts HERE. StockCharts members, please vote for me HERE, thanks.
Like to read more of my commentaries? Please subscribe my Daily Market Report. Subscribers can find all the members only posts HERE. StockCharts members, please vote for me HERE, thanks.