TraderGirl wrote:I don't know if I want to start drinkin' the Kool-aid just yet. 2009/2010 we had massive amounts of QE involved, once it ran out the markets puttered out....now it depends on earnings, and so far it's 50/50 lot's of warnings, and so far every time we have hit a new resistance zone, we pulled back at least once. I see a new resistance around 1311-1312, I guess we will see what happens when we get there.... just my thoughts....

Right now it's only a notion, but I think I can get the money to make it into a concept, and later turn it into an idea.
re Kool-aid (electric acid test or jim jones?). not disputing your resistance points--but would suggest two minor tweaks.
(1) the earnings are not the issue as much as forward guidance. we actually know earnings are not amazing due to the point you make re warnings. (intc great example--we know they miss stock is up hard) (2) QE can be seen in several ways. (a) the euro zone getting (on the surface at least) more into "the liquid thing" (except that there are zeros missing should be more like 5 trillion). (b) the idea held by far too many people (eg maybe factored) that they actually will do yet another formal QE.
i am only trying to make the case that the focus is not even real in the sense of something concrete like earnings--it's all about what will be done next to fix things--and the sense that only a short time ago it was the end of the world. if earnings did start to turn bad--you would then justify QEx. (sigh)
we have shifted from a market back say in the 1960s to 1990s based at least partly on actual business events--to a very synthetic relative sort of concept driven market. just as many people's lives have shifted indoors and onto screens away from lives on farms in construction (outside). the whole thing is very surreal.
finally all of us at the site are part of the problem or solution (the solution just leads to the next problem and the problem just leads to the next solution). all this technical trading as well as trend following simply amplifies the whole process.
generally all this synthetic liquidity eventually helps the world move everyone forward over the longer term. but shorter term the situation is so bogus it's insane to turn on the screens every day. buckminster fuller once said "you can make money or make sense" and there is something to that. the whole thing is like nano tech which everyone sees as a win win till you breath some nano items which cluster in the cortex and then it's closer to win-sort of lose. nano like liquidity is not going back in pandora's box--and we do need it to move forward and it's likely better in general for everyone eventually--but it's odd stuff also. and there will be these minor bugs to work out.
lets see what happens around your key area. good luck with your trades