SWalsh wrote:Cobra wrote:at least the measured move target reached, well, almost.
There are a lot of reasons that this should be a solid down week. But if this is to be like 2009, every time you have a setup for a 5-3-5-3-5 (an impulse wave of 1-2-3-4-5) you get a 5-3-5 (A-B-C) as they know where they have to stop it. That's why it happens. Given the 90%+ times they did it to this kind of setup in 2009 ( a statistically impossible wave counting year), and only did NOT do so when QE2 ran out, it is unquestioned that they know where they need to hold the mkt, and that the Fed is still pumping money in, announced QExx or not. That quote stuffing this morning that started immediately might be 2nd only to August 9th when they turned the mkt and shut-down trading platforms.
What's that quote? Something like, "I had to break the free mkt system to save it". I don't see the mkts as "free" anything but "shovel ready" to remove money from the public. It beats working with asphalt and repairing an overpass.
They can surprise me and this can be a wave "ii" bounce in wave 3 down and we close below 130.00 SPY, but we have done a retracement that would appear not to fit and the speech is tonight.
swalsh "we had to destroy the village to save it" (re ben tre). well if you are into kali thinking which destruction and construction are the same thing seen from 2 different angles. . .it's sort a works. here is the thing--"the public" has been losing money in markets for the last 10k years as long as man has been around. what i find most frustrating is that the average guy actually puts more time into planning his 2 week a year vacation (assuming he still has a job) than he does watching his "investments".
i see that you feel very strongly the system is a mess. well i am 58 and it's been a mess since i was even slightly aware. we could see this coming in the 70s. but we are the system. it's not some dark small group (although there are plenty of these) it's all of us. nobody is clean if they are using the system--and we all do. so it's closer to the Indian idea of tantra (kali in the above case) than it is not.
going back to the public--the nyt once (was early 90s) printed the following data--13% of the american public can take a 2 page newspaper story and extract the data and then formulate an argument based on the FACTS in that story. to my mind this translates as 87% of the american public cannot understand any serious issue. the same story estimated that something like 69% could read a bus schedule and figure out how to get on a bus.
so the my point is we are the problem and we are the solution. if the so called public wants to win--it means giving up weekends and so on for say 5 years to understand what they are up against--and then playing being able to read a 2 page story and deal. i keep reading how the market is tweaked etc--but the 5 min stuff (al brooks/cobra) still works. anyone can learn this stuff in a year or two starting from scratch.
Bottom line--i hear what you are saying about the nature of corruption and dishonesty. But knowing that one must take some action other than saying the game is rigged--if one wants to get ahead. what is not as commonly discussed is that the public is not doing that. perhaps out of ignorance. perhaps out of fear. it's hard to say because like the above destruction=creation it's everything at the same time.
If people want out of the cycle--they are going to have to study--maybe give up contact sports and pop music for a few years. if this is the case--they can win. for example i gather your kids are fairly bright as you are. they chose to go to college. they are now pressed to get paid for their efforts (and i hope they are not stuck on student loans). but with their skills they can study al brooks for 1 year and trade effectively. i was broke and under pressure when i got started and used my only path--credit cards to take positions (leaps--long term equity anticipation options 1-3 years sort of thing)in INTC. it took me 4 years of paper trading to make the first trade--during a period i was working 80 hours a week to barely make it(my business owned me--i assure you-- the situation was hyper marginal) to learn basic options. and then i risked everything i had. often trading from a cell phone in a truck in the woods with no charts-trading intc or amat from memory. it worked. But it was not easy.
all i am saying is that each of us has serious resources if we choose to use them--we are best served to focus on what we can do at our best and not by focusing on the impediments to that action. I DON'T DENY ANY OF YOUR MAJOR POINTS--i am trying to include them. and say "how can we win given the situation?". i can only think of 4 elements of that action (1) be one of the 13%. (2) study whatever on your own. (3) take serious calculated risks. (4) be aware that "the odds" are more a physical system thing--and that living learning entities skew the math--eg think outside the box.
good luck on your trades and as always with your kids.