uempel wrote:This was funny - some guys just don't want the market to tank.
ww.png
That is true, but like in that story of the Tower of Babel, BOTS seem to have their communications mixed up and generated this monster.
I don’t trade this kind of stuff!
I don't quite understand why bulls are defending 1313, I guess I'm missing something. I see more attractive levels for a bounce a bit further down. I'm slightly more bearish than bullish, but I don't mind going long for a nice bounce, even if it's tricky.
Ascending channel line/support line dating from 12/19
FYI ..Inflowing liquidity had a hi peak on Wed..Yesterday had a small dn tick..Today looks like another dn tick..For mkt dn move it has to break 1313/1310 then 1308/1306 otherwise sidways.
uempel wrote:This was funny - some guys just don't want the market to tank.
The attachment ww.png is no longer available
That is true, but like in that story of the Tower of Babel, BOTS seem to have their communications mixed up and generated this monster.
I don’t trade this kind of stuff!
I don't quite understand why bulls are defending 1313, I guess I'm missing something. I see more attractive levels for a bounce a bit further down. I'm slightly more bearish than bullish, but I don't mind going long for a nice bounce, even if it's tricky.
this is what i'm seeing a little longer term. this levels looks marginally important...
uempel wrote:This was funny - some guys just don't want the market to tank.
ww.png
That is true, but like in that story of the Tower of Babel, BOTS seem to have their communications mixed up and generated this monster.
I don’t trade this kind of stuff!
I don't quite understand why bulls are defending 1313, I guess I'm missing something. I see more attractive levels for a bounce a bit further down. I'm slightly more bearish than bullish, but I don't mind going long for a nice bounce, even if it's tricky.
Ascending channel line/support line dating from 12/19
SB73 wrote:Small caps and Emerging markets currently inverse the S&P. The true risk on trade seems alive and well for right now.
With this type of divergence on IWM I would say last push unless we trade it to new high, for now bearish.
Not disagreeing, just really trying to get a read on the tape. Even everybody's favorite TVIX (which I traded once and got killed on) was up 4% in the pre-market and is now down.
SB73 wrote:Small caps and Emerging markets currently inverse the S&P. The true risk on trade seems alive and well for right now.
With this type of divergence on IWM I would say last push unless we trade it to new high, for now bearish.
Curious, have you ever looking into the success rate of trading divergence?
Sorry to interpret.
I find divergences only tradable with a high probability when met with a large resistance or support level depending on which side you are trading. 12/19 bottom comes to mind.
Like to read more of my commentaries? Please subscribe my Daily Market Report. Subscribers can find all the members only posts HERE. StockCharts members, please vote for me HERE, thanks.
uempel wrote:This was funny - some guys just don't want the market to tank.
ww.png
That is true, but like in that story of the Tower of Babel, BOTS seem to have their communications mixed up and generated this monster.
I don’t trade this kind of stuff!
I don't quite understand why bulls are defending 1313, I guess I'm missing something. I see more attractive levels for a bounce a bit further down. I'm slightly more bearish than bullish, but I don't mind going long for a nice bounce, even if it's tricky.
on my count, es 1308-1309 is the line for do or die. the equivalent in spx is +4.25 which is 1313-1314 area. if lost i don't think they could put together def around 1300, we will go straight to 1285-1290 area.
The goal is not uniformity. It is understanding and idea exchange.
I don't think the market will go higher until financials get through this area of resistance.
Earnings are in, what's left to be a catalyst for financials?