L_T wrote:What do you think of Al Brooks' new three books compared to the one older one? I've been looking for someone who has read the old and new to see if all three of the new are worth picking up.
Can you share any of the details of the types of breakouts you take? Just curious.
hiram wrote:good morning cobra
your last couple nights reports are in my opinion are each worth the 120 i paid you for the year! between your daily dose of wisdom and als three new books my home grown strategy of intraday trading spy breakouts via options has put me in the mid 4 figures for my year to date return using my standard 10k position. i dont post much but i read everyday and if work doesnt allow me to follow post by post i always make sure to replay the market using ninja trader as i read the live posts, this also lets me score other posters effectiveness from a call standpoint. to sum up for anyone reading this post paying the 10 mthly or 120 yearly is in my opinion the best value anywhere on the internet.
Thanks Cobra I appreciate your hard work!
P.S i also owe huge props to bullbear Al Cougar and 99 for unknowingly assisting in my tradeing education.
---------
only my opinion--the first book has everything you need if you spend a lot of time with it due to the simplicity of the method. generally you can make a very simple inclusive statement--but it requires the listener to either have a great deal of understanding--or be willing to put much concentration into that simple thing. or you can make a long series of exclusive statements and in theory the listener is slowly drawn though the data and learns.
the glitch is the more you explain--the harder the reader has to work to get back to the original meaning that the whole explanation started from. or the the less you explain the statement the more the student has to struggle to grasp what is contained in the simple statement. in both cases the student should be careful to consider the possible pitfall and err in the direction of overdoing it in the direction he chooses (eg simple idea more thought and work--complex idea more effort to grasp the root meaning)
in this context if you look at what al is saying--at it's essence it is
(1) "every price bar tells a story or has meaning" (this is it in a one sentence nutshell the problem is the idea is too compact for people to grasp)
(2) "groups of price bars have meaning"
(3) "with proper understanding of 1 and 2 you can in effect "understand the market in every moment it is open using nothing but a 5 min chart with a 20 ema on it".
(4) cut down the number of trades and scale size of trade as you get better
Optional stuff that al notes but for one reason or another doesn't always do.
(4) the best thing to do is find a trend and get in fast if it is a fast trend--or buy a pull back if it is a slower trend. (he scalps too)
(5) pick only optimal trades (eg strong trends) (he takes lots of trades)
(6) stick with one time frame and spx futs (he buys some stocks and different time frames)
Key considerations (to me)
(1) if al likes to be in the market alot--is this picking the best trades?
(2) what mental processes does the student need to apply to actually do this 5 min stuff day in and out and stay focused in the right areas. (what does the student need to do to concentrate that is not taught in the book)
(3) is the point of trading to make money or to have fun
(4) how much time is trading worth given our short time on the planet
what i am trying to say is "don't get lost in a forest of ideas explained in insane detail for 1500 pages and forget al's real brillance--every price bar and every group is telling a story if you listen. "looking for something (eg chart pattern etc) is not the same as looking at something." when we look for something--even as subtle and cool as some of als more amusing 1-5 price bar patterns are--we fail to see everything else. we need at all costs to look at what is going on not what we want to go on or what we learned should go on.
another way to say this is "listening is not the same as thinking"
I was too busy thinking about too many things one after another.
He said that when we talk to ourselves without listening carefully we usually are not aware of preoccupations or obsessions that separate us from someone or something.
LISTENING. . .IS DIFFERENT THAN THINKING BECAUSE IT IS MORE REFLECTIVE MORE OBSERVANT
good luck with your trading