[quote="Al_Dente"]Looking just at the Relative Strength Ratios, it appears to be a rotation-type thingie.
In Jan and early Feb folks bought the “risk-on” mid and small caps. Then they started selling the small and mid caps and buying the large caps ($OEX).
After the market corrected last week (if u blinked u missed it) folks have started buying the “risk-on” small and mid caps again.
If they had been really scared last week, they would have shed everything and bought the safety and cushy comfort of bonds (they didn’t).
I suppose that is what we must keep an eye on: when the correction resumes, it is inevitable that we’ll see it in money flow out of stocks and into bonds
of all maturities, especially the shorter terms (like IEF etc) and the ETFs like TLT.
NICE POINT AL--ROTATION IT IS. this is a highly speculative idea--but in situations like this i try to find 2 or ideally 3 cycles of pulling back and going up to or just over the whole top. generally you could define this as "we hold the 20 and 50 ema (more or less) on a daily chart. assuming this happens--look very carefully at the 3rd move up--this has the potential to blow out to the upside over 20-40 trading days.
the whole thing feels like "there is no real reason to sell". people keep focusing on stuff like Greece or AAPL but these things are blatant that mostly the price is factored. Something is missing here--a reason for a sell.
generally as a guy who often uses ta to keep track of things--i try to avoid the news. (car chase movies-and porn sites are far safer for traders than "news" or "analysis" 90% of the time) in situations where there is rotation or slow grinds up--you are looking for an inflection point ("the difference that makes a difference" Gregory Bateson). so times like this i blow 6 hours on a weekend reading stuff like aapl intc/arm plans news etc and follow the euro stuff. i try to think of it as junkies think of the idea of "chipping" (eg don't let it get out of hand)
the thing about rotation that psychs people out is that money is not coming out. but maybe it's worth noting it also means money is no going in (in any serious way) either. in movies or books this is about where you get lines like
"it's quite out there. . .far too quite" (100s of movies)
"it would be nice to do something. . . WE are doing something. We're sitting here waiting" (Ronin david mamet robert de niro john frankeheimer)
"A warrior knows that he is waiting and what he is waiting for; and while he waits he wants nothing and thus whatever little thing he gets is more than he can take. If he needs to eat he finds a way, because he is not hungry; if something hurts his body he finds a way to stop it, because he is not in pain. To be hungry or to be in pain means that the man has abandoned himself and is no longer a warrior; and the forces of his hunger and pain will destroy him."
(a separate reality carlos castaneda)
Bonus total speculation--so far the whole thing the whole thing (on a 2 year daily) is starting to look like a 3 peaks and domed house pattern.
http://thepatternsite.com/3peaksdome.html
using this idea and assuming point 14 was last NOV or DEC low--you are looking at a point 23 high between 5-1-12 and 8-30-12. Amusingly this fits the ecri call. (these guys are pretty accurate overall--nobody is flawless--but generally they have been in there)
Bonus speculation 2--if you accept the last crazy idea--then your question is "what would make the market go to say 1490 to 1600". the ideal way to achieve this would be (1) to have a problem crop up in the euro zone or usa econ stuff--that gets solved (so fear and then breakout)