57chevy wrote:SWalsh wrote:Cobra wrote:so far goes as planed. I'm still neutral. didn't have a good sleep last night, so I'm very sleepy now, what a boring market.

It is taking only 100 stocks quote stuffs to move SPY 10-12 ticks. I've never seen it this thin.
I am listening to John Batchelor's Sunday night radio show that is syndicated on WABC. So far, I cannot find the 10 minute discussion on High Frequency Trading, the damage it has done, and the FBI investigations.
Mr. Walsh,
I don't post much here but I'm in the habit of seeking out your thought-provoking commentary, especially the facts and insight you provide about HFT. You've stimulated my interest and helped me to grow much more knowledgeable about this important subject. Keep up the good work. HFT is a dreadful affliction. Don't let the naysayers get you down. You're one of the best things about this blog.
Here is a letter from Tradeworxs, that has helped design trading systems, and the biggest pile of manure as to why HFT is an asset to the mkt. Now this is curious to anyone with a brain cell. They admittedly rarely lose, yet they argue that to hinder their operation would be bad for the mkt.
The commentary below, which is in support of HFT trading, shows the term
"Long-term Investor" referenced twenty-two times. It discusses how it does not interfere with the activities of them as well as claims they have lower transaction costs.
The term "Short-term investor" is ABSENT!
http://sec.gov/comments/s7-02-10/s70210-129.pdf
Let me give a simple example why the comments about
"Program Trading" posted earlier are rather naive. And I do hope the many who hit Cobra's site read this twice and consider that it has not been written by someone who does not know how this "game" works. I'm guessing that 98%+ of people here have never been professional Wall Street traders. I am not one of that number.
The Game Facts: (this example will simplify the effects of HFT on your ability to profit)
1 - The market, less commissions which many HFTs pay little to nothing, has a certain number of winners and losers per day participating. That number has dwindled. An article the other day asked where all the volume has gone and stated we are at lower levels than Dec, 2007.
2 - Of the amount lost in a given day an equal amount is made(for the sake of simplicity we will not consider commissions)
3 - In any given "game"
(let's use professional poker and there are 5 tables to play at but this one right now is unique) for someone to positively never lose on a given day they must be able to see every card on the table as they leave the deck in a game of Texas Hold 'Em. They will not win every hand as their cards are not always the best hand. But they know when they will win and can strategically bet in such a way that their winning hands far outweigh the losing ones. Plus, they can fold, but just not every hand they do not win as that would signal something fishy. Yet in the HFT world, a six-shooter is not aimed at your gut under the table so you can not play, or quit, if so desired and there is no one to complain as you are invisible in a computerized world.
Now, you are a
short-term player , by definition, in that card game. It can last 4 hours or even 24 hours, but it ends. There is no
"long-term". To foolishly, or mistakenly, enter that 1 of the 5 tables where the cards are marked to just one individual is to court financial disaster. There are 4 other tables that are not corrupt in this example, but you do not know of them. To you they are all the same in one casino and your seat is comfortable and the drinks are free and with a smile. As you sit there and continue to play, not realizing that the one player/entity seeing the cards is not taking all the money available, but just a nice profit, so that you remain, you think that you still have a chance to profit. But the winning portion for the remaining players is smaller. It
MUST BE as one player is systematically removing chips from the table. Plus, while you are playing, friends of the crooked individual have manged to takeover the remaining 4 tables. There is no place left to go but play in a game that is corrupt, but you don't know it, won't admit it, and naive people tell you that you need to practice on a simulator and come back when you have money again to play with.
You have been setup to be separated from your money and you think it is your inability to play well. And that is metaphorically true for most traders. But now, even the best of traders are having difficulty and their "edges" that they worked hard to develop and use as a framework for consistent profits is the road to perdition. Without the best of money management and a consideration of "I better take a good deal of that profit now (with no reason to) because in 1-5 seconds it could be a loss", you can get hammered.
But none of the above kind of talk, in what I think is a very applicable example, was allowed to be metaphorically discussed in the TradeWorx letter to the SEC. Why? Because they are hoping for, and so far have widely succeeded, in making valid points within the context of "long-term Investors". And why is this important to not discuss the short-term ramifications? Because it is the stated goal of
THIS ADMINISTRATION AND THIS CORRUPT (IMO) PRESIDENT to remove speculators from the market and to leave only "Long-term investors". That way, we are back to "Stalin sets the price of grain". And if you can't see the parallels then don't condemn them through a misunderstanding of how the market works and how it is controlled. Read about what took place after the Bolshevik Revolution and consider my points again. For anyone thinking this is paranoia uses it as an excuse for poor scholarship.
Does anyone seriously have a question about HFT activity at this point and how it
DEFINITELY has been destructive of the markets? if you do not see the simplicity of this example, and how it relates to the day-to-day institutional rape of the traders and customers, please take the time you spend doing this and consider going to earn a Masters degree in something that interests you, because this "game" is only for those who accept the playing field at any given time. One used to be able to be a great trader and not have to worry that much about outstanding money management as you did well and were highly profitable. Now, if you are on the wrong side of an HFT move that might be told to put the Dow up 100 points this minute, you will not be able to act quickly enough many times to click that mouse that will send in that market order. That is because what you see on the screen may well have happened 1/4 to 3/4s of a second ago, or more, if they are really stuffing quotes towards the record the high of 42,000 quotes in a second to create latency, and your desire to get out at a certain point just caused a loss 5 times in excess if where you had planned to get out of your position.
Anyone stating that Program Trading is not necessarily bad should reconsider their position as they are thinking exactly the way the game wants them to think - "There is still good money to be made", when the fact is that far less is available to the speculator. They have been, and successfully to a degree, marked for destruction. Blog activity across the Internet would seem to back that up as do my conversations with brokers and owners of clearing firms that I speak to.
That radio show the other night (which appears to have been sanitized from WABC, much as former NYSE Grasso's appearance calling HFT "Parasites that should be ripped out", didn't last 24 hours online) discussed that to stop them would destroy the markets, and therefore the entire economy, due to their percent of liquidity in the marketplace now. It's that many other players have been driven from the square that a small cabal controls prices. They have destroyed the markets and the radio guest Sunday night said what is feared is The Law of Unintended Consequences arriving, as nothing like this has ever been seen before. And as I have stated numerous times, Wall Street is necessary for the formation of capital. They hit the WTC for a reason. And they hit not just a Grand Slam, but they knocked it well out of the park. These HFTs are not computerized trading methodologies involved in portfolio strategy. They are theft machines involved in "The Race to Zero" that NANEX writes of. And it is logical to assume that eventually, traders will have as much chance at survival as a Frenchman putting his head up from a trench at The battle of Verdun (10 months and 758,000 French and German casualties and 182,000 dead). My understand is that if you were caught putting your leg up to get hit and be sent home you'd be shot on the spot. Many traders have lost many limbs feeding these banks profits as they should have gone under and been replaced by stronger institutions. Bush fed them and Obama has gorged them.
This is what you face trading daily. Accept it or quit. I hope some reading of this for the first time will consider this presentation of what really takes place and that it helps you understand what you are facing as your TA books won't tell you this.
Good luck....every trader needs a healthy dose.
Thanks, 57Chevy, for your kind words. I hope there are some others that understand one cannot remove government from this because just as in the 1920s when the Fed Window funded the banks, they surely fund the HFTs and those are at least the 5 big banks that, if real estate were not placed on the balance sheets as performing and at higher values, would have been forced to liquidate.