Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
A thought I have been having about precious metals, mining stocks and treasuries/fixed income...DellGriffith wrote:Nothing!Mr. BachNut wrote:Neutral.
My summation signal is down for the SPX and neutral for the R2K. The SPX will go neutral today barring a surprise and the R2K needs new highs to turn up.
My composite trend signal is up.
New Fed head promises more QE forever. Santa Claus rally on deck. January effect rally on deck. No threats in sight.
What could possibly go wrong?In fact, how about a further correction in precious metals, as people take their money out of that sector and use it to buy equities causing more rally?
I had a spreadsheet signal I call the Crossstlwater wrote:A major sell signal IS possible today since we have an open above the daily BB on SPX and an open below the daily BB on the VIX as well. Let's pray the bears can pull it off.
When everyone is drunk at a 1929 revival partyquientuves wrote:Snif..!!I was waiting a little bank crash after Moody's downrate of the big 3...
I guess you bring em POMO and everything else a minor issue...
Royal Flush wrote:Hi joegamma, please explain "TRIN MIGHT GIVE A SELL SIGNAL NEXT DAY OR SO, bretz rule needs 5 day avg below 4.0" the 5 day avg would always be below 4.0 as TRIN is seldom above 4.0joegamma wrote:TRIN MIGHT GIVE A SELL SIGNAL NEXT DAY OR SO, bretz rule needs 5 day avg below 4.0For a strong rally, we need a surge in NYADV, or a drop in nyhgh from these levels, normally ratio needs lower still looking at these and wondering if we are in a new leg up or not and, RARE to see the amex highs have negative slope, not sure what it implies
I think it is a 5 day total not average. You would use an average of 0.8 as a threshold.Royal Flush wrote:Hi joegamma, please explain "TRIN MIGHT GIVE A SELL SIGNAL NEXT DAY OR SO, bretz rule needs 5 day avg below 4.0" the 5 day avg would always be below 4.0 as TRIN is seldom above 4.0joegamma wrote:TRIN MIGHT GIVE A SELL SIGNAL NEXT DAY OR SO, bretz rule needs 5 day avg below 4.0For a strong rally, we need a surge in NYADV, or a drop in nyhgh from these levels, normally ratio needs lower still looking at these and wondering if we are in a new leg up or not and, RARE to see the amex highs have negative slope, not sure what it implies
Great Signal!uempel wrote:Update:
Thanks for the detail Mr. BachNut: won't the times it does work always be at highs/tops? I presume you mean that the probability of it working is lower if below a prior high or not a long way up in a leg off a recent bottom.Mr. BachNut wrote:I think it is a 5 day total not average. You would use an average of 0.8 as a threshold.Royal Flush wrote:Hi joegamma, please explain "TRIN MIGHT GIVE A SELL SIGNAL NEXT DAY OR SO, bretz rule needs 5 day avg below 4.0" the 5 day avg would always be below 4.0 as TRIN is seldom above 4.0joegamma wrote:TRIN MIGHT GIVE A SELL SIGNAL NEXT DAY OR SO, bretz rule needs 5 day avg below 4.0For a strong rally, we need a surge in NYADV, or a drop in nyhgh from these levels, normally ratio needs lower still looking at these and wondering if we are in a new leg up or not and, RARE to see the amex highs have negative slope, not sure what it implies
I have some experience (read scar tissue) on this.
I have found that win rates on this are dramatically different depending on whether you are in a bull trend or bear trend.
The signal has good tradeable odds in a bear trend, but it is a coin flip in a bull trend IMO.
That said, it is worth keeping an eye on in a bull trend because the times it does work (52%) are often at highs/tops.