Back to www.cobrasmarketview.com |
yup, them Canadians will mesmerize u every timeBullBear52x wrote:for now the counter trend is getting intensify. song? sure, you got me stuck with that Canadian sweet heart in the last 30min.Al_Dente wrote:bb did I mention 50/50 = chop...vwap is right there...how hard is it to take out a little pink line...[U didn’t do anything “Tooooooopid” did u boss?.........U need more girlfriend song?]BullBear52x wrote:base on what I see, bears can take this down easy. lets go or give up already
Unfounded rumors of possible rumor of takeover/buyer.noob wrote:Anybody know why did AMD pop today?
MrMiyagi wrote:Thanks! I'll mortgage the house and buy all I can...Nrsimha wrote:My $ 0.02:
I was sorta waiting for 10 week ma to cross the 20 week --- getting close, And that MACD crossover on the weekly looks bullish.
Also both of my programs that use multi-parameter models and then maximize over backtesting (maximizing the parameters using simulated annealing) are flashing a buy signal.
I don't like to deal with companies whose CEO used assets to buy his own toys.knock wrote:anyone wants to short CHK? it hits a strong resistance. hope to get some opinion.
thanks!MrMiyagi wrote:I don't like to deal with companies whose CEO used assets to buy his own toys.knock wrote:anyone wants to short CHK? it hits a strong resistance. hope to get some opinion.
Do yourself a favor and look at something else; while CHK may tank, it may also squeeze a lot of folks are holding a bag full of dog poop from the 20$+ range.
Thanks, I was hoping to buy around $3.75 area never had the chance. NVDA earning tmr though.BullBear52x wrote:no clue once they trade under 5$ it's out of my favor, check MU, the 5$ rule is goood support for it.noob wrote:Anybody know why did AMD pop today?
Double top and some Neg. D to support the bear case, not bad.MrMiyagi wrote:I don't like to deal with companies whose CEO used assets to buy his own toys.knock wrote:anyone wants to short CHK? it hits a strong resistance. hope to get some opinion.
Do yourself a favor and look at something else; while CHK may tank, it may also squeeze a lot of folks are holding a bag full of dog poop from the 20$+ range.
Yep, chartwise AND factwise I would short this to zero BUT BUT BUT once crooked you never know what kind of news or revelation can come to light.BullBear52x wrote:Double top and some Neg. D to support the bear case, not bad.
Thanks for the answer, I'll check to see if I can find options volume on those sites.Al_Dente wrote:U can track volume on XIV (bull spy) and VXX, UVXY (bear spy)su_root wrote:NP!........So there Isn't any way to look at VIX options volume (chart plot)? There has to beAl_Dente wrote:Thanks su...btw $VIX and $VXO being indices = no volume...So I use $NYDNV:$NYUPV ratio to find down volumesu_root wrote:Thanx, VTX(21) on a weekly SPX chart looks quite good (long entry, trailing stop/win) at a first glance.Al_Dente wrote:STOCKCHARTS NEW TOYS ALERT…
But those ETFs move with VIX volatility FUTURES not options
Check the cboe.com site for options volumes
Also bernie schaeffer may have some stuff on volume
OR a kind options trader could jump in here and offer a much better answer
what does NP mean?
short closed @ 140.25EvilTrader wrote:Short @ 140.5
stop @ 140.67
Up with this TICK? Nah!uempel wrote:Update:
That was quick?! You think bears are chicken?EvilTrader wrote:short closed @ 140.25EvilTrader wrote:Short @ 140.5
stop @ 140.67