Royal Flush wrote:Heck wrote:Royal Flush wrote:
Hi Heck, I read opening long Index undervalued Calls more than twice Puts. I calculated the closing average for C/P for Equity = 169.8%, for Index = 51.5%
So Index approximately puts are twice calls on average, put the Q's are declining anyway

ISEE Index (not Equity) call/put ratio is 46%, so *undervalued* Index (not overvalued Equity) put/call is 1/.46 = 217%
.
The key is which undervalued (not overvalued) data set ratio (of three) to use:
Check All, Equity, Index implied volatility premiums versus VIX or VXN, since odds favour buying undervalued premia and selling overvalued.
Raw Index Data at 12:30:
39,438 Calls 85,145 Puts 124,583 Total 46%
If I understand you correctly then, at 9:50 the Indices & ETF Only C/P volume was 7,952/3,543 = 224, therefore implied volatility premium of puts was low because of the preference for calls and one should buy Index puts and sell calls?
No.
(Used to teach university Option course and inverse multiple simultaneous variables not always easy to cipher.)
The first two ISEE readings of the day, undervalued Index/ETF options were on the buy call side (call volume > put volume) and the market went up. Then subsequent readings were on the sell side (put volume >call volume) and market went down.
Implied volatility premiums of specific Indices/ETF options like QQQ or SPY are given by most brokers.
Compares them to VXN or VIX and each other (calls vs puts) to see if they are undervalued or overvalued, then watch what the undervalued classes (All, Equity, Index calls/puts) are doing.
GL
PS Jon and Pete Najarian Option Monsters have a "free" promo book out for shipping and handling:
http://www.howwetradeoptions.com/
(Receive no money ~ met DRJ at TSAAF presentation.)